Archived How Does an Infinitely High Potential Wall Impact Quantum Wave Functions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the Schrödinger equation for a quantum system with a step potential and an infinitely high wall. The wave functions for the regions are expressed in terms of constants that need to be determined through boundary conditions. The continuity of the wave function and its derivative at the boundary leads to a system of equations that can be solved for the constants. The analysis shows that the infinite potential wall results in total reflection, confirming that the particle cannot penetrate this barrier. This problem illustrates the behavior of quantum wave functions in the presence of varying potential energies.
stefan10
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider reflection from a step potential of height v-knot with E> v-knot, but now with an infinitely high wall added at a distance a from the step.

infinity < x < 0 => v(x) = 0
0≤ x≤ a => v = vknot
x=a => v= infinity

Solve the Schroedinger equation to find ψ(x) for x< 0 and 0 ≤ x ≤ a, solution should contain only one unknown constant.

Homework Equations



T-Independent Schrodinger EQ

General forms of a wave function.

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it correct to first assume that all constants are physically possible in both equations? You'll have a reflection and transmission at the first finite barrier, and a reflection (always) at the infinite barrier. That means there are four constants in both equations. If not, can you explain why?

I should have

ψ_1 = A1 cos (k1*x) + B1 sin(k1*x) (or the respective complex exponentials)
ψ_2= A2 cos(k2*x) + B2 sin(k2*x) (this is for the region 0≤x≤a

When I look at the three boundary conditions,

1. ψ_1(0_ = ψ_2(0)

2. dψ_1/dx (0) = dψ_2/dx (0)

3. ψ_2(a) = 0

I get a complicated algebraic relation between the constants that does not simplify.

So I assume I must get rid of one of the constants, but I'm unsure which one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Solving the SE equation in the two regions, we get
\begin{align*}
\psi_1(x) &= Ae^{ik_1x}+B^{-ik_1x} \\
\psi_2(x) &= C\sin[k_2(x-a)] + D\cos[k_2(x-a)]
\end{align*} where ##k_1^2 = \frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}## and ##k_2^2=\frac{2m(E-V_0)}{\hbar^2}##.

From ##\psi(a)=0##, it follows that ##D=0##. (Writing ##\psi_2## in terms of ##x-a## instead of just ##x## simplifies the algebra.) Continuity of the wave function and its derivative at ##x=0## yields
\begin{align*}
A + B &= -C \sin k_2 a \\
ik_1 A - ik_1 B &= C k_2 \cos k_2 a.
\end{align*} Since ##e^{ik_1x}## represents the incident wave, let's choose to solve for the other two constants in terms of ##A##. Applying Cramer's rule to the system
\begin{align*}
B + C \sin k_2 a &= -A \\
B + C \left(\frac{k_2}{ik_1}\right) \cos k_2 a &= A,
\end{align*}we get
$$B = \frac
{\begin{vmatrix} -A & \sin k_2 a \\ A & \left(\frac{k_2}{ik_1}\right) \cos k_2 a \end{vmatrix}}
{\begin{vmatrix} 1 & \sin k_2 a \\ 1 & \left(\frac{k_2}{ik_1}\right) \cos k_2 a \end{vmatrix}}
= A \frac{ \sin k_2 a - i\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}\right) \cos k_2 a}{\sin k_2 a + i\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}\right) \cos k_2 a} \\
C = \frac
{\begin{vmatrix} 1 & -A \\ 1 & A \end{vmatrix}}
{\begin{vmatrix} 1 & \sin k_2 a \\ 1 & \left(\frac{k_2}{ik_1}\right) \cos k_2 a \end{vmatrix}}
= -A \frac{2}{\sin k_2 a + i\left(\frac{k_2}{k_1}\right) \cos k_2 a}.$$
After doing a problem like this, it's good to sanity-check your answers. For example, you can show that ##\lvert B/A \rvert^2 = 1##, which indicates that particle is always reflected, as you'd expect because of the infinite potential. A good idea would also be to check what happens when ##V_0=0##. There should be no reflection at ##x=0##.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top