How does an object's velocity change over time during constant acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
In constant acceleration, an object's velocity changes over time, with each speed represented at a specific moment on a velocity-time graph. The relationship is defined by the equation v = v0 + a0 * t, where acceleration (a) is constant. For example, when an object is dropped, gravity accelerates it at approximately 10 m/s², increasing its velocity by 10 m/s every second. Although the velocity at any given moment is singular, the object transitions through all intermediate velocities until an external force, like the ground, stops it. Thus, while velocity is a snapshot at a point in time, it reflects a continuous change during acceleration.
skm22
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
When something is accelerating at a constant rate, each speed on the velocity-time graph is only present at one specific point in time. For example, it might be at 5m/s at 5 seconds. How is that possible? Speed is the change in distance over change in time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
skm22 said:
Speed is the change in distance over change in time
Yes, usually written v=\frac{ds}{dt}.
skm22 said:
When something is accelerating at a constant rate, each speed on the velocity-time graph is only present at one specific point in time.
Yes. Acceleration is the change of velocity over change in time, usually written a=\frac{dv}{dt}. So, if a is constant, v=v_{0}+a_{0}\cdot t (constant acceleration or deceleration). The standard example: you hold an object at height h and drop it. Then gravity will impose a constant acceleration on it and since it started with velocity 0, you have v=g\cdot t (at least until the object hits the ground).
 
I didnt understand your question.Are you asking how can we show velocity as point in velocity-time diagram ? How this is possible ? Is this your question
Svein gave the answer while I was writing.
 
well gravity causes things to accelerate at a constant rate, says ~ 10 m/s^2. What this means is that every second that an object falls under gravity on earth, ignoring air resistance, its velocity increases by 10 m/s. If you drop something from rest its velocity is zero. After 1 second its velocity is 10m/s, 2 seconds its 20m/s. This increase of velocity happens in time. So the object must 'pass through' all of the velocities in order to attain 10 m/s. Then it passes through every velocity from 10 - 20 m/s etc and will keep on doing so until something stop it, like the floor.

While the velocity is only ever one value at on specific time, it does not need to travel any distance at that value for us to assign it say 5m/s and t = 5 seconds. If we remove the force at the instant its velocity it 5 m/s, this will be its velocity indefinitely.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top