How Does Changing Arm Position Affect a Spinning Professor's Kinetic Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tandoorichicken
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotating
AI Thread Summary
Changing the arm position of a spinning professor on a rotating platform significantly affects his angular velocity and kinetic energy. Initially, the professor's angular velocity is 1.5 rad/sec, which increases to 5.0 rad/sec when he pulls his arms in. The ratio of his final kinetic energy to initial kinetic energy is calculated to be 25:4.5, but the weight of the professor and dumbbells does not influence the horizontal motion. The key concept is the conservation of angular momentum, which remains constant throughout the motion, and the radius from the center of rotation must be adjusted when calculating kinetic energy. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
tandoorichicken
Messages
245
Reaction score
0
A physics teacher stands on a freely rotation platform. He holds a dumbbell in each hand of his outstretched arms while a student gives him a push until his angular velocity reaches 1.5 rad/sec. When the freely spinning professor pulls his hands in close to his body, his angular velocity increases to 5.0 rad/sec. What is the ratio of his final kinetic energy to his initial energy?

Basically what I have done is formed the professor into a model of 1) a rod with two spinning dumbells and 2) a cylinder. Using that I was able to use the equations for rotational KE:
KE_0 = \frac{1}{2} I \omega_{0}^{2} = \frac{1}{2} (mr^2) 1.5^2 = 1.125mr^2 and
KE_f = \frac{1}{2} I \omega_{f}^{2} = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{1}{2} mr^2) 5^2 = \frac{25}{4} mr^2.
Dividing the second equation by the first I got a ratio of 25:4.5
However, it never occurred to me that the weight of the teacher and the weight of the dumbbells might have an effect on the outcome of this problem. So basically, how do I do this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular momentum is given by L=I\omega

Basically this is a quantity that must be conserved so if his initial E_k=\frac{L^2}{2I} must be equal to his final kinetic energy and thus a ratio of 1:1 would be the answer as far as I can see.
 
"Weight" has nothing to do with this problem- everything is happening horizontally, not vertically. You do, of course, have to use the mass, m. It cancels out in the final calculation as you saw.

However, you seem to be using the same "r" in both problems and that is not correct. r is the distance from the center of rotation (i.e. the teacher's central axis) to the center of mass. That changes when the dumbbells are drawn in toward the body.

Since you are not told the different radii (you might estimate them based on a typical person but you can't get them precisely), the best thing to do is use Kurdt's hint. Can you say "conservation of energy"?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top