How Does Changing Capacitor Characteristics Affect Its Capacitance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ***
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
AI Thread Summary
Capacitance is affected by various factors, including charge, potential difference, plate area, and distance between plates. Doubling the charge increases capacitance, while tripling the potential difference decreases it. Halving the distance and doubling the plate area both increase capacitance, while reducing the electric field does not change it. The capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor remains constant unless the dielectric, area, or distance changes. Charging a capacitor does require work, as energy is stored in the electric field, which is released when discharging through resistance.
***
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Please help! Capacitance question!

Does the capacitance increase, decrease, or stay the same if:

1. the charge on the plate doubles?
2. the potential difference across the plates triples?
3. the distance between the plates is halved?
4. area of the plates is doubled?
5. electric field is reduced by half.



My answers are

1. increases
2. decreases
3. increases
4. increases
5. same

Are these correct?

Also, True or false: "Charging a parallel plate capacitor requires no work provided the charges placed on the two plates are equal and opposite." Provide appropriate reasoning.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


The capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor is equal to

\frac {\epsilon A} {d}

where \epsilon is a property of the dielectric between the plates, and A and d are the area of the plates and the distance between the plates. As long as none of these change, the capacitance doesn't change either, so a and b are wrong.


part 2.
When you discharge a capacitor through a resistance, where comes the energy for the
heating of the resistance come from? How can a capacitor contain energy if charging it
takes no work?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top