How Does Charge Affect Spring Compression in a Frictionless System?

AI Thread Summary
In a frictionless system, two blocks connected to springs experience compression due to electrostatic repulsion after charges are applied. The left block has a charge of 45 microcoulombs and the right block has a charge of 16 microcoulombs, causing them to move apart and compress their respective springs with stiffness constants of 75 N/m and 50 N/m. The equilibrium of forces can be analyzed using the electrostatic force formula and the spring force equations, leading to two equations with two unknowns for the spring compressions. Energy conservation is not applicable in this scenario since external work is involved as the blocks move apart until they stop. The solution requires balancing the forces from both springs against the electrostatic repulsion.
velvetchere
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
two small blocks are resting (and touching) side-by-side on a frictionless tabletop. the block on the left is connected to a wall to the left of it by a spring having stiffness constant k=75 N/m. the one on the right is connected to a wall on to the right of it by a spring of k=50 N/m. when the two blocks are touching, the springs are at their natural lenghts. a charge of Q=45 microcoulombs is placed on the left block, and a charge of 16 is placed on the right block, causing them to move apart and compressing their respecitve springs. if the blocks are allowed to slowly move apart until they stop, determine the amount each spring will be compressed at this point.

would conservation of energy be applied to this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I am understand the question correctly, I believe you merely have to equate the electrostatic force of repulsion with the spring force.
I don't think energy is conserved in this situation (what causes the blocks to stop?).
 
thanks for your reply. ok, so I'm assuming that we're basically treating each block as a particle, and that the electrostatic force would equal
(ke)(q_1)(q_2) divided by r^2. and i suppose r is essentially the distance that the springs compress?

i'm a little iffy on the spring aspect of the problem, being how we're given two k values.
 
You have 2 unknowns (the compression of each spring) and 2 equations, the eqilibrium of the forces in the end, and energy conservation. Solve them and you'll get your answer.
 
The two equations you need are

k_1x_1 = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon} \frac{q_1q_2}{(x_2-x_1)^2}

and

k_2x_2 = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon} \frac{q_1q_2}{(x_2-x_1)^2}

Energy conservation is not applicable to this problem. There must be some external force doing work on the system, as evidenced by the phrase "blocks are allowed to slowly move apart until they stop".
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top