How Does Charge Conservation Apply to Matter-Energy Conversion?

AI Thread Summary
Charge conservation remains intact during matter-energy conversion, as demonstrated in nuclear explosions where matter transforms into energy. In these events, particles with charge are not annihilated with their anti-particles; instead, protons and neutrons rearrange to release energy without violating charge conservation. The principle asserts that for every charged particle, there exists an equal and opposite anti-particle, which is crucial in particle interactions like electron-positron annihilation. However, in nuclear reactions, the focus shifts to the reconfiguration of existing particles rather than their complete conversion. Thus, charge conservation is upheld even as matter is converted into energy.
Itai Blank
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I've been thinking about this for a while, my personal example was a nuclear explosion, but I'm talking in general about events in which matter is converted to energy..
Sticking to my original string of thought, in a nuclear detonation, matter is transformed into energy. But matter consists of particles that do or do not possesses electrical charge. And I thought of the Charge Conservation Law. How could matter be transformed into energy, making charge... well.. disappear..? I think I might have an answer to my own question, but it's always good to be sure.
I thought that maybe those particles have to be transformed in pairs, each consisting of two particles of opposite and equal of absolute value charges.. That is if a particle with X charge is converted into energy, then a particle of -X charge must also be converted.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes you're right. Charge conservation must always be true, so particles can only annihilate with their anti particles (For every charged particle, there is another particle of equal mass but opposite charge known as its anti-particle). Electron + positron -> 2 photons is the most common example.

A nuclear explosion is different though, since anti-particles are not involved. Rather the protons and neutrons that are already present are re-arranged in such a way that allows for the release of energy.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top