How Does Charge Density Affect Electric Field Inside a Cylindrical Insulator?

PhysicsRetard
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A long cylindrical insulator has a uniformcharge density of 1.46uC/m3 and a radius of 6cm.a-What is the electric field inside the insulator at a distance of 2cm and 12cm? Answer should be in N/C.

b-How much work must you do to bring a q=0.086uC test charge from 12cm to 2cm? Answer in J.

Homework Equations


I have started with p=Q/V. With V= \pir2h

The Attempt at a Solution

...yet there is no h??
I know for r>R and r<R there are differences. I am lost. Please someone point me in the correct direction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yet there is no h??

Well, it's there in the volume charge density that you've written, right? You have to construct an appropriate gaussian surface and apply Gauss's law to find the field. Can you proceed from here?
 
Step 1. Write down Gauss's law: \oint \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{a} = \frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0}
Step 2. Determine the direction of electric field (radially outwards) and the Gaussian surface you're going to use (a cylindrical shell).
Step 3. Find the total charge enclosed within your Gaussian surface. Hint: Q = \rho V.
Step 4. Do the math to find the field. The height h will cancel on both sides of Gauss's law equation.

For part b, integrate the electric field to get the potential.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top