How does composite armour work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nikitin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Composite Work
AI Thread Summary
Modern tanks have shifted away from sloped armor designs, which were common in WWII, due to advancements in composite and perforated armor technologies that focus on deforming and abrading penetrators rather than deflecting them. This change has resulted in a more blocky appearance for tanks like the Leopard 2 and M1 Abrams, with only a few models, such as the Israeli Merkava, still utilizing sloped armor. The effectiveness of sloped armor has decreased further due to the rise of top attack weapons and urban warfare tactics, which often target the roofs of armored vehicles. The specific characteristics of modern armor materials, like the classified Chobham armor on the M1A1, contribute to their design choices. Overall, the evolution of armor technology reflects the changing nature of battlefield threats.
Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Hi, I noticed that most modern tanks have barely any slope on their armour, unlike for example the old WW2 tanks like the T-34 using solid steel armour.

Why exactly is this? Why is sloping of armour gone? I realize that modern armour isn't trying to deflect a shell, but still if armour is sloped 60 degrees from vertical, it would, from a horizontal perspective, be 2x thicker.

Only a few tanks have sloped armour, a few Israeli and Russian ones.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Different materials have different characteristics than steel when it comes to mitigating the damage from tank shells. I believe the details of the Chobham armor on the M1A1 are still classified... I can't imagine information on other modern armor is readily available either.
 
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sloped_armour

However, the latest main battle tanks use perforated and composite armour, which attempts to deform and abrade a penetrator rather than deflecting it, as deflecting a long rod penatrator is so difficult. These tanks have a more blocky appearance. Examples include the Leopard 2 and M1 Abrams. An exception is the Israeli Merkava.

The relevance of sloped armour has further diminished due to modern top attack weapons and the increase of urban warfare in which the roof of AFVs is often attacked from high buildings.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top