How Does Conservation of Momentum Determine the Trajectory of Rocket Fragments?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a weather rocket that explodes into two fragments after liftoff, raising questions about the conservation of momentum and the resulting trajectories. The lighter fragment ascends to a height of 530 m, while the heavier fragment's speed and direction post-explosion need to be determined. Participants emphasize the importance of applying the conservation of momentum principle rather than simply relying on specific equations. They suggest calculating the final velocities of both fragments using kinematics to solve for the heavier fragment's characteristics. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the motion of the fragments after the explosion.
DStan27
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
A 1550 kg weather rocket accelerates upward at 20 m/s2. It explodes 2.0 s after liftoff and breaks into two fragments, one twice as massive as the other. Photos reveal that the lighter fragment traveled straight up and reached a maximum height of 530 m. What were the speed and direction of the heavier fragment just after the explosion?

is there a way to use momentum and distance to find the speed. i know the second particle goes downward, but i can't figure out how to do this. I've tried everything i can think of.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
should i be using mv = m1v1 + m2v2??
 
DStan27 said:
should i be using mv = m1v1 + m2v2??

Is momentum conserved in this situation? If so, then you should be. Don't ask, "should I be using such and such equation?" Ask, "which physical principle applies to this situation?"

Anyway, have you figured out how to calculate v, the final velocity of the rocket? What about v1, the velocity of the less massive fragment? That should be simple kinematics in both cases. Once you have calculated those velocities, do you have the information you need to solve the problem?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top