How Does Cylinder Dynamics Change When Rolling Down a Steep Inclined Plane?

AI Thread Summary
When a cylinder rolls down a steep inclined plane, its scalar velocity no longer equals ωR due to the influence of friction coefficients. The minimum inclination angle required for the cylinder to overcome static friction can be calculated using the relationship between mass, moment of inertia, and forces acting on the cylinder. The equations of motion indicate that the acceleration is affected by both the gravitational force and the frictional force, which changes once slipping begins. As the cylinder transitions from rolling to slipping, the kinetic friction coefficient alters the dynamics, leading to increased acceleration. Understanding these interactions is crucial for accurately determining the cylinder's translational and rotational energy distribution.
jaumzaum
Messages
433
Reaction score
33
If we had a cylinder rolling down a ramp, with scalar friction coefficient us and kinetic friction coefficient uc, and we assume for example that the inclination of the ramp is enough to make the cylinder reach the acceleration needed to exceed the scalar friction of rolling. It means that the scalar velocity of the cylinder is not equal to ωR anymore (where ω is the angular velocity). So how can we calculate the angular and scalar velocity now? Or in other words, the parcel of the kinetic energy directed to translational and rotational energy?

Is it possible to calculate the minimum inclination of the ramp that satisfies the statement above?

If needed use other variables like h for the height of the cylinder, g for gravity, etc...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jaumzaum said:
If we had a cylinder rolling down a ramp, with scalar friction coefficient us and kinetic friction coefficient uc, and we assume for example that the inclination of the ramp is enough to make the cylinder reach the acceleration needed to exceed the scalar friction of rolling.
I assume you mean that the slope is sufficient that the forces overcome static friction. If the slope is constant, it's not a question of the cylinder reaching such a condition after some time; it'll happen straight away or not at all.
Suppose cylinder has mass m, moment of inertia I (you didn't say whether it was hollow or solid, etc.) linear acceleration a, radius r. The normal force is N, the frictional force F. Slope has angle θ to vertical.
Forces parallel to the slope: ma = mg cos θ - F
Perpr. to slope: N = mg sin θ
Angular accn = a/r
Moments about cylinder's centre: Fr = Ia/r

At rolling limit: F = usN = us mg sin θ
Fr2 = us mgr2 sin θ = Ia = mgr2 cos θ - mar2
a = mgr2 cos θ /(I + mr2)
tan θ = I /((I + mr2)us)

Once it has started to slip, F reduces to ucN, so the acceleration will increase a bit.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top