How Does Double-Paned Glass Affect Heat Transfer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter {~}
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Glass
AI Thread Summary
Double-paned glass significantly reduces heat transfer due to the thermal conductivity difference between glass and air, with glass being 36 times more conductive. The discussion involves calculating heat flow through a 1.75 cm layer of air with a temperature difference of 20 °C, leading to an approximate heat flow of 26.3 W/m². The calculations for temperature differences across the glass panes are complicated by the need for additional equations due to the series conduction setup. The final temperature difference across each pane was incorrectly calculated, indicating a misunderstanding of the heat transfer equations. Accurate modeling of heat transfer in double-paned windows is essential for understanding their efficiency in insulation.
{~}
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement [/b]

Consider a double-paned window consisting of two panes of glass, each with a thickness of 0.500 cm and an area of separated by a layer of air with a thickness of 1.75 cm. The temperature on one side of the window is 0.00 °C; the temperature on the other side is 20.0 °C. In addition, note that the thermal conductivity of glass is roughly 36 times greater than that of air. (a) Approximate the heat transfer through this window by ignoring the glass. That is, calculate the heat flow per second through 1.75 cm of air with a temperature difference of 20.0 C°. (The exact result for the complete window is 19.1 J/s.) (b) Use the approximate heat flow found in part (a) to find an approximate temperature difference across each pane of glass. (The exact result is 0.157 C°.) (Thermal conductivity of glass is 0.84 W/(m?K) and of air is 0.0234 W/(m?K))

2. Homework Equations [/b]

\frac{\Delta Q}{\Delta t} = kA\frac{T_{1} - T_{2}}{l}

3. The Attempt at a Solution [/b]

This is actually me trying to help someone else on another website and apparently failing

Here's what I got

Part (a)

Equation 19-16a from fourth edition Giancoli Physics for Scientist and Engineers

cramster-equation-2011510154056344063880593290129575.gif


Our givens

k = 0.0234 W m-1 K-1

T1 - T2 = 20 K

l = 1.75x10-2 m

Leave the unknowns on the left side of the equation and substitute the givens on the right

cramster-equation-20115101556486344063980820727135051.gif


Note: The m K are part of the themal conductivity units

Evaluate

26.3 W m-2

Notice that this is not the complete answer for (a) because an area was not provided; however, this does not prevent me from completing (b)

Part (b)

I modify Eq 19-16a for a situation of series conduction

cramster-equation-20115101618396344064111929085491386.gif


Substitute givens

cramster-equation-20115101630586344064185896372217980.gif


The algebra is a little intense but here goes

We have two unkowns but only one equation. We need another equation to solve the problem.

Lets draw a picture

7ceac401-ccc2-44a9-aea4-895393cb5536.jpg


This problem has symetry that we can exploit

20C - T2 = T3 - 0C

T3 = 20C - T2 + 0C

Substitue and rearange

Note: I divided k and l for neatness

26.3 W m-2 = 168 W m-2 K-1 (20C - T2) + 1.34 W m-2 K-1 (T2 - (20C - T2 + 0C)) + 168 W m-2 K-1 ((20C - T2 + 0C) - 0C)
Simplify

26.3 K = 168 (40C - 2T2) + 1.34 (2T2 - 20C)

Distribute

26.3 K = 6720C - 336 T2 + 2.68 T2 - 26.8C

Evaluate

333 T2 = 6670 K

T2 = 20.0 C

Obviously I screwed up somehow I just can't see where
 

Attachments

  • cramster-equation-2011510154056344063880593290129575.gif
    cramster-equation-2011510154056344063880593290129575.gif
    548 bytes · Views: 407
  • cramster-equation-20115101556486344063980820727135051.gif
    cramster-equation-20115101556486344063980820727135051.gif
    1.1 KB · Views: 380
  • cramster-equation-20115101618396344064111929085491386.gif
    cramster-equation-20115101618396344064111929085491386.gif
    1.6 KB · Views: 366
Physics news on Phys.org
In case of series connection the current of heat is the same for each element, window-panes and air. Your equation for dQ/dt is wrong.

ehild
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
785
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top