How Does Earth's Rotation Affect Projectile Trajectory Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the validity of the potential energy equation mgh, questioning its accuracy due to variations in gravitational acceleration (g) at different heights. It is noted that while mgh is applicable for small height changes, a more general equation, Ug = -G*m1*m2/r, should be used for greater heights. The impact of Earth's rotation on projectile motion is highlighted, particularly how tangential velocity varies based on geographic location. An additional term for kinetic energy must be included to account for Earth's rotation, specifically -1/2 m(ω × r)². Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities involved in accurately calculating projectile trajectories considering both gravitational changes and Earth's rotation.
holtvg
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Is the potential energy equation technically invalid as potential energy is defined as mgh but as h changes g changes, so if i launched a projectile at 2000 m/s straight up or 90 degrees, how high would it go. Guess the change in g is negligible at heights below 1000m. So technically the exact potential energy of an object is not mgh.

What if you launched the projectile at an angle other than 90 degrees, how would you account for the rotation of the Earth aka the tangential velocity, not to mention the tangential velocity is different depending on where you are as the radius is different.
:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right...mgh applies for when changes in g are negligible. There is a more general expression -- Ug = -G*m1*m2/r.
 
holtvg said:
What if you launched the projectile at an angle other than 90 degrees, how would you account for the rotation of the Earth aka the tangential velocity, not to mention the tangential velocity is different depending on where you are as the radius is different.
:confused:
The expression for the potential energy doesn't change and is given in the previous post.

You are right, for the kinetic energy one has to add an extra term -\frac12 m(\omega\times \vec{r})^2 due to the rotation of the earth, where r is the position on the Earth see from the center.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top