How does electric potential relate to point charges in homework problems?

AI Thread Summary
Electric potential is a scalar quantity, not a vector, which means it does not have direction. In the context of two isolated point charges, the potential at a specific point P can be zero if the contributions from both charges cancel each other out. This cancellation occurs when the sum of their potentials, expressed as kq/r for each charge, equals zero. Understanding this concept allows for the calculation of the unknown charge at point B based on the condition that the total potential at P is zero. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing how electric potentials from multiple charges interact.
WeiLoong
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/12417589_10205411987170709_6390638921146727371_n.jpg?oh=e166de7d1246b4afacebe60bac5ce654&oe=570B03E4&__gda__=1460454017_6cad38b2934b81eeeccbeedf05704e4b

Homework Equations


Electric potential

The Attempt at a Solution


Is electric potential a vector quantity?
So that mean both charges product electric potential and result in zero at P?
How should i start for question 17a?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WeiLoong said:
Is electric potential a vector quantity?
No. It is scalar.
 
Electric potential is a scalar. Now, what does it mean that potential at P is zero? You have two isolated point charges, that each one produces an electric field around it. So, how can the potential at P be zero? Answering that, you can immediately see that using this fact and a simple formula, you can calculate point charge at B.
 
QuantumQuest said:
Electric potential is a scalar. Now, what does it mean that potential at P is zero? You have two isolated point charges, that each one produces an electric field around it. So, how can the potential at P be zero? Answering that, you can immediately see that using this fact and a simple formula, you can calculate point charge at B.

That mean kq/r+kq/r=0 something like that?
 
WeiLoong said:
That mean kq/r+kq/r=0 something like that?
What would be the potential at point P, if you didn't have point charge at B? But you have this point charge at B and potential at P is zero. So, you have a zero from two scalars (V). What does this imply for the second potential (i.e. regarding B)?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top