How does Fermat's principle explain the shape of a lens in Feynman's derivation?

AI Thread Summary
Feynman's derivation of a lens shape using Fermat's principle raises questions about how light chooses its path to minimize distance to a focal point. The discussion highlights uncertainty about whether light inherently knows to focus on a specific point rather than any arbitrary location. This leads to a broader debate on the nature of Fermat's principle, questioning if it represents a fundamental truth in physics or merely a useful approximation. The analogy of water flowing downhill is used to illustrate the concept of natural pathways in physics. Ultimately, the interpretation of Fermat's principle may hinge on one's philosophical view of physics itself.
neworder1
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I have a problem in understanding Feynman's derivation of a lens' shape using Fermat's principle. Feynman writes that we have to choose such a surface of the lens that all optical ways from the source S to the focal point F will have the same length (so all will be taken by the traveling light). However, how do we know that the light chooses its path so as to minimize the distance from S to F and not to another point G, or any other point? When Feynman derives Snell's law while source and target points are fized, it's OK, bu here tHe light doesn't "know" that there is a focal point, it could go anywhere (i.e. destination point is not fixed in any way). So I don't see how we can use Fermat principle here.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The same way water 'knows' to flow down hill or electricty 'knows' to flow through the lowest resistance.
Fermat's principle is either the greatest idea in physics - in a way it pre-invented both relativity and quantum mechanics, or it's just a convenient short cut to get the right answers.
It depends on your philosphical veiw of the nature of physics really.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top