How Does Force Convert to Energy in Electromagnetism?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the work done by the force in electromagnetism can be expressed as δW = I δΦ, where δΦ represents the change in magnetic flux. The calculation begins with the force equation δW = F·δr and involves the cross product of the current element and the magnetic field. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly executing the cross product before the dot product to maintain clarity in the scalar triple product. The area swept out by the displacement vector is defined, leading to the conclusion that δW equals I times the magnetic flux, as required. The proof is validated through the relationships established in the calculations.
ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
One of the problems in my textbook of electromagnetism is about proving that the work done by the force \vec{F}=I \vec{dl} \times \vec{B},is \delta W=I \delta \phi where the circuit isn't rigid and the displacement vector of the element of interest is \vec{\delta r} with a constant current and \delta \phi is the change in magnetic flux.My calculation is as follows:
<br /> \delta W=\vec{F}\cdot \vec{\delta r}=I (\vec{dl}\times \vec{B})\cdot \vec{\delta r}=I[ \delta x (dy B_z-dz B_y)+...]=I[(\delta x dy-\delta y dx)B_z+..]<br />
To complete the proof,I should be able to set \delta A_z=\delta x dy-\delta y dx,etc.(\delta A_z being the change in area caused by B_z).My problem is,I don't know how to justify it!
Any ideas?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are (correctly) trying to evaluate is a scalar triple product. You can cyclically shift the terms round (look it up, say, in Wiki) so that the cross-product is of the dl and dr vectors, giving you a directed area... Then use the definition of phi...
 
Did you succeed? This is what I had in mind...

\delta W = \vec{F}.\vec{\delta r} = I \vec{\delta l}\times \vec{B}.\vec{\delta r}

[This is unambiguous without brackets. The cross product has to be executed first, because if we tried to do the dot product, \vec{B}.\vec{\delta r}, first, it would yield a scalar, rendering the cross product meaningless.]

We are allowed to re-arrange this scalar triple product cyclically...

\delta W = I \vec{\delta r} \times \vec {\delta l}. \vec{B}.

Now, \vec{\delta r} \times \vec {\delta l} is easily shown to be a vector \vec{\delta S} of magnitude equal to the area swept our by \delta l, and directed normally to this area..

But, by definition of flux, \delta \Phi = \vec{\delta S}.\vec B

Thus we have \delta W = I \Phi as required.
 
Last edited:
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top