How does frame dragging cause a stick to rotate in the opposite direction?

AI Thread Summary
Frame dragging, a phenomenon in general relativity, involves the motion of a massive rotating object affecting nearby objects, similar to planetary gears. When a straight meter stick is positioned near such an object, the end closer to the rotating mass experiences a different gravitational influence than the end farther away, leading to potential confusion about its rotational direction. The gravitational effect is not solely based on the mass but also on the motion of the source material, complicating the interaction. Changes in frame dragging over time or position are what induce motion, rather than the frame dragging itself. Thus, while it may seem intuitive that the stick would rotate in the opposite direction, the actual mechanics involve more complex interactions influenced by the rotational frame dragging field.
Holesarecool
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Now, I've read that frame dragging will cause an effect likened to planetary gears, where the spinning source is the sun gear and the object is the planetary gear. Here's where I get confused.

Suppose you had a straight meter stick aimed directly at a massive rotating object from an equitorial radius > EH. If the rotation of the object is from left to right from your perspective, it seems that from my example, the part of the stick closer to the object will start to rotate towards the right, and the rear of the stick will rotate towards the left.

Now, since the material on the left hand side of the object is spinning 'towards' the stick, and the material on the right is moving away, shouldn't the affect of gravity be larger coming from the left hand side of the object? In the same sense that the light coming off of it will be at a higher wavelength on the left than the right due to GR.

I'm sure I've gone astray with an assumption here or there, but shouldn't this situation lead to a stick rotating in the opposite direction as predicted by frame dragging?

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Holesarecool said:
Now, I've read that frame dragging will cause an effect likened to planetary gears, where the spinning source is the sun gear and the object is the planetary gear. Here's where I get confused.

Suppose you had a straight meter stick aimed directly at a massive rotating object from an equitorial radius > EH. If the rotation of the object is from left to right from your perspective, it seems that from my example, the part of the stick closer to the object will start to rotate towards the right, and the rear of the stick will rotate towards the left.

Now, since the material on the left hand side of the object is spinning 'towards' the stick, and the material on the right is moving away, shouldn't the affect of gravity be larger coming from the left hand side of the object? In the same sense that the light coming off of it will be at a higher wavelength on the left than the right due to GR.

I'm sure I've gone astray with an assumption here or there, but shouldn't this situation lead to a stick rotating in the opposite direction as predicted by frame dragging?

Thanks

In GR the effective gravitational "force" is not due only to the scalar effect of the source mass (like an electrostatic field) but also has components due to the motion of the source material (like a magnetic field, only more complicated). Frame dragging is a direct effect of source motion.

Frame dragging (at least the rotational component) does not in itself cause motion locally; it is changes in frame dragging (with time or with changing position) which cause motion.

Rotational frame dragging is described by an angular velocity field. Locally, rotational frame dragging has the effect that something which is rotating at the rate which matches the frame dragging field feels as if it is not rotating and something which is at rest relative to the coordinate system experiences effects as if it were rotating the opposite way.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top