How Does Gauss' Law Apply to a Non-Uniformly Charged Hollow Sphere?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Gauss' Law to determine the electric field around a hollow spherical shell with a non-uniform charge density. The user initially struggles with calculating the enclosed charge (Q_enc) for the region between the radii a and b. The confusion arises from whether to integrate up to radius b or to a variable radius r. Clarification is provided that for the electric field calculation in the specified region, the Gaussian surface should extend only to radius r, not b. The user acknowledges the misunderstanding and expresses gratitude for the clarification.
hatsoff
Messages
16
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



A hollow spherical shell carries charge density \rho=k/r^2 in the region a\leq r\leq b. Use Gauss' Law in integral form to find the electric field in three regions: (i) r<a, (ii) a<r<b, (iii) r>b.

Homework Equations



Gauss' Law in integral form: \oint_{\text{surface}}\textbf{E}\cdot d\textbf{a}=\frac{1}{\epsilon_0}Q_{\text{enc}}

where Q_{\text{enc}}=\int_{\text{volume}}\rho\;d\tau is the total charge enclosed within the surface.

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm looking at (ii) to start. Due to symmetry we have \textbf{E}=|\textbf{E}|\hat r and so we can pull this out of the left term of the integral in Gauss' law. But I'm confused on how to compute Qenc. I would expect to take the radius part of the integral from a to b, this way:

Q_{\text{enc}}=\int_{\text{volume}}\rho\;d\tau= \int_{\text{surface}}\int_a^b \rho\;dr\;d\textbf{a}

However the solutions manual suggests that I should leave r as a variable and take the integral from a to r, this way:

Q_{\text{enc}}=\int_{\text{volume}}\rho\;d\tau= \int_{\text{surface}}\int_a^r \rho\;d\bar r\;d\textbf{a}

I don't understand this. Why do we get to ignore the field between r and b?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well part ii) is asking for the electric field between a and b. So where will the Gaussian surface extend to?
 
BruceW said:
well part ii) is asking for the electric field between a and b. So where will the Gaussian surface extend to?

OH, I see now!

That was silly.

Thanks.
 
haha, no worries!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top