How does gravitational anomalies affect a planet's rotation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how gravitational anomalies can influence a planet's rotation and angular momentum. Kinetic energy of a rotating planet is calculated using the formula KE = 1/2 mv² + 1/2 Iω², where I is the moment of inertia and ω is angular velocity. It is noted that angular momentum remains constant unless acted upon by an external torque, which is typically zero in gravitational contexts. The presence of gravitational anomalies, such as uneven mass distribution, could theoretically affect a planet's rotation by altering its moment of inertia, thus changing its rotational period. Overall, while gravitational anomalies can impact rotation dynamics, they do not directly relate to kinetic energy calculations.
Bjarne
Messages
344
Reaction score
0
How is the kinetic energy of a rotation planet (e.g; the earth) calculated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Bjarne! :smile:
Bjarne said:
How is the kinetic energy of a rotation planet (e.g; the earth) calculated?

But why would anyone want to calculate it?

It's not as if anyone would consider trying to change its orbit, is it? :confused:

KE of a rotating body = 1/2 mv2 + 1/2 Iω2

where I is the moment of inertia of the planet about its polar axis, and ω is the angular velocity

(don't forget to include both the spin and orbital angular velocity, eg the Earth's is 2π x 366.25 radians per year, not 2π x 365.25)
 
Thank's tiny-tim
Is it possible that angular momentum affect the rotation of planets?
Does it exist rotating Moons?
 
the angular momentum of a planet about its star (or a moon about its planet) is constant …

this is because the rotational version of Newton's second law says …

torque = rate of change of angular momentum​

and since the torque (moment) of the gravitational force is obviously zero (about the star), the angular momentum cannot change :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
the angular momentum of a planet about its star (or a moon about its planet) is constant …

this is because the rotational version of Newton's second law says …

torque = rate of change of angular momentum​

and since the torque (moment) of the gravitational force is obviously zero (about the star), the angular momentum cannot change :smile:
What I had in mind, what about if a planet or a star had a heavy gravitational anomaly at the surface, a tidal wave, a mountain a crust density anomaly etc.. This would make the planet heavier in the one "end" as in the other "end" .

Would that not cause larger angular momentum in the "heavy end" of the planet, and cause a planet to rotate.

For example the Moon, the more massive side of the Moon point in the direction of the Earth.

Imaging the massive part was pointing opposite and the orbit speed of the Moon would be 30 times faster, - would that not cause the Moon to begin to rotate ?
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
What I had in mind, what about if a planet or a star had a heavy gravitational anomaly at the surface, a tidal wave, a mountain a crust density anomaly etc.. This would make the planet heavier in the one "end" as in the other "end" .

Would that not cause larger angular momentum in the "heavy end" of the planet, and cause a planet to rotate.

a tectonic plate movement (an earthquake) would alter the moment of inertia (the distribution of mass) …

since the angular momentum must remain constant, that would alter the period of rotation (the length of the day)

(of course, this has nothing to do with energy)
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top