How Does Gravitational Time Dilation Affect Clocks on Earth and Satellites?

Seedling
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the difference in time after one year between a clock at Earth's surface and a clock on a satellite orbiting at 300 km above the surface


Homework Equations



T = T0 / (1 - 2gR/c^2)^.5

That is, this:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/imgrel/gtim3.gif


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't understand how to use this equation to get the difference between the clock on the satellite and the clock on the surface. Do I just take the value of T with R = Earth's radius, and again with R = Earth's radius + 300 km, and take the difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Seedling! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 tags just above the Reply box :wink:)
Seedling said:
T = T0 / (1 - 2gR/c^2)^.5

I don't understand how to use this equation to get the difference between the clock on the satellite and the clock on the surface. Do I just take the value of T with R = Earth's radius, and again with R = Earth's radius + 300 km, and take the difference?

The ratio, rather than the difference …

T0 is the time on a clock "at infinity", and TR is the time on a clock at radius R, so TR/T0 is the ratio of their "speeds", and TR=h/TR is the ratio you want. :smile:

(But remember that this formula only gives you the general relativity time dilation … there'll also be an ordinary Lorentz time dilation, in the opposite direction :wink:).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top