How Does Heat Flow Direction Relate to the Second Law of Thermodynamics?

AI Thread Summary
Heat naturally flows from high to low temperature areas, aligning with the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which states that entropy tends to increase in isolated systems. In a one-dimensional conductor with ends maintained at temperatures T_0 and T_L, the steady-state temperature distribution indicates that T_0 must be greater than T_L for heat to flow in the positive x-direction. The relationship between heat flow and entropy change is crucial; as heat (q_0) enters the conductor, the entropy change must remain non-negative, reinforcing that heat moves towards lower temperatures. The discussion also highlights the importance of understanding the mathematical formulations of the Second Law to demonstrate this principle. Overall, the flow of heat and the increase of entropy are interconnected, affirming the directional nature of heat transfer.
MJCfromCT
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
"Proof" of heat flow direction?

Hi everyone, I have a homework problem that basically says to prove that heat is conducted from a high temperature area to a low temperature area:

Homework Statement



Consider a one-dimensional conductor, stretching from x=0 to x=L. The two ends are maintained at T_0 and T_L. The four sides of the conductor are insulated. The temperature distribution along the conductor is steady.

q_0 represents the heat that enters through the x=0 cross section. Assume q_0 is position, so heat is conducted in the positive x-direction.

Invoke the 2nd law to prove that q_0 flows toward lower temperatures, for example, by showing that T_L cannot be greater than T_0

Homework Equations



2nd Law of thermodynamics


The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt is as follows:

I have the 2nd Law in the following form:

http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/9004/problem11qw8.jpg

I have come across this equation in my text (Heat Transfer, Bejan, 1993) as well:

http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/6189/problem12ks5.jpg

I wish to substitute this equation into the "q" part of the 2nd Law. From here, in order for the "dS/dt" term to be greater than or equal to zero (Entropy always increasing), the T_0 - T_L term must be greater than zero, therefore, T_0 must be greater than T_L.

Does this make sense? I'm not sure what to do about the summation term in the form of the 2nd law that I have. Do I only pick the "0" position and forget about the "L" position?

Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question got me curious, so I pulled out my old statistical physics text (berkeley physics course-volume 5 by F. Reif). Heres a couple of quotes that may help?
In an infinitesimal quasi-static process in which the system absorbs heat dQ, its entropy changes by an amount
dS=dQ/T
where T is ...called its absolute temperature.

In any process in which a thermally isolated system changes from on macrostate to another, its entropy tends to increase, i.e.,
deltaS>=0
...is significant because it specifies the direction in which nonequilibrium situations tend to proceed.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the reply. I agree with the quotes you have listed, but I am unsure as to how they help. I agree that they discuss the means by which entropy increases, but I am unsure as to how the increase in entropy relates to the diffusion of heat from a high temperature area to a low temperature area.
 
Back
Top