How Does Iceberg Buoyancy Relate to Sea Water Density?

AI Thread Summary
An iceberg floats with 10% of its volume above sea water, leading to a discussion on the relationship between the densities of sea water and ice. The initial calculation suggested that the density of sea water is 9/10 that of ice, which was later corrected to indicate that sea water is actually denser than ice, with a ratio of 10/9. The key concept is that the mass of the iceberg equals the mass of the displaced water, allowing for the establishment of a density relationship. The final conclusion confirms that sea water is indeed denser than ice, aligning with common observations. This understanding is crucial for solving buoyancy-related problems in physics.
Agent M27
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An iceberg is floating on sea water such that only 10% of its volume is above the water level. What is the density of sea water expressed in terms of the density of ice.


Homework Equations



\frac{Vf}{Vi} = \frac{\rho}{\rho}

\rhof = density of sea water
\rhoi = density of ice

The Attempt at a Solution


I know this is a rather simple problem but where I am getting hung up is the ratio of the visible portion of the iceberg. I hate to admit but the simple maths trip me up. I began by isolating the eq so that:

\rhof = \rhoi \frac{Vi}{Vf}

from which I get \frac{9}{10} \rhoi


By the way this is an even number problem so I cannot look up the answer, so is this correct?

Thanks in advance.

Joe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Agent M27 said:

Homework Equations



\frac{Vf}{Vi} = \frac{\rho}{\rho}

\rhof = density of sea water
\rhoi = density of ice
You left out the subscipts on the ρ terms in your equation.

The Attempt at a Solution


I know this is a rather simple problem but where I am getting hung up is the ratio of the visible portion of the iceberg. I hate to admit but the simple maths trip me up. I began by isolating the eq so that:

\rhof = \rhoi \frac{Vi}{Vf}

from which I get \frac{9}{10} \rhoi
Think about your answer. It says that the sea water is (more, less?) dense than the ice, and therefore the iceberg should (float, sink?).
 
As you said, It's a very simple problem.

\rho_{0}V_{0}g=\rho g (V_{0}-V)

\rho_{0} and V_{0} are density and volume of the iceberg and \rho is density of water and V is visible volume of the iceberg.

You can easily get the sought ratio.

\frac{\rho_{0}}{\rho}=\frac{V_{0}-V}{V_{0}}=1-\frac{V}{V_{0}}
 
From my answer it says that the sea water is less dense than that of ice, which is actually incorrect when I think about a glass of ice water. So then my answer ought to be:

\rhof = \frac{10}{9} x \rhoi

which correctly shows that the sea water is more dense than ice, is this the correct answer?

Thanks redbelly. Also I didn't put the subscripts in the original EQ because I have issues when I apply subs scripts in a fraction for some silly reason.

Joe
 
Looks good. One way to remember this is that the total mass of the iceberg (or other floating object) equals the mass of the displaced water (or other fluid). Since mass is equal to ρV, you can set up the equation by equating the two masses.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top