How Does Increasing the Mass of the Topmost Particle Affect the Center of Mass?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the center of mass for a three-particle system and exploring how increasing the mass of the topmost particle affects its position. The center of mass coordinates are derived using the formula x(com)=(x1m1+x2m2+xnmn)/M. As the mass of the topmost particle increases, the center of mass shifts closer to that particle, aligning with the definition that it behaves as if all mass were concentrated at that point. Participants suggest re-evaluating the equation to derive a more concise explanation and consider the implications as the mass approaches infinity. This mathematical approach can clarify the relationship between mass distribution and center of mass movement.
brendan3eb
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What are (a) the x coordinate and (b) the y coordinate of the center of mass of the three-particle system shown in Fig. 9-22? (c) What happens to the center of mass as the mass of the topmost particle is gradually increased?

Fig 9-22 shows a particle at the origin, a particle at (1,2) and a particle at (2,1)


Homework Equations


x(com)=(x1m1+x2m2+xnmn)/M


The Attempt at a Solution


I solved parts a and b easily. And I reasoned that the center of mass should move towards the topmost particle as the mass of the topmost particle is gradually increased because the center of mass of a system of bodies by definition is the point that moves as although all of the mass were concentrated there, and thus the center of mass will be located close to the particle with the greatest mass.

I am not sure if my answer to C is sufficient. It seems too long; I would expect a more concise explanation. I also feel as though my teacher may take my argument to be circular, perhaps the question wants you to prove the definition of center of mass than use it as proof.

What do you guys and gals think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
look closely at your equation for the center of mass... Try to decompose the fraction and rewrite it in a different way. You could then get your conclusion mathematically just by reasoning about the proportions of the masses, and thinking about how the y(com) and x(com) change as, say, m3 starts to increase. For that matter, think also about what happens as m3 goes to infinity. (not sure if you did this in class yet, but it would show your result very nicely as well)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top