How Does Infinite Density Lead to the Big Rip?

KGC
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, in the eqn of state [density prop. to a^-3(W+1)] if you subbed in W=-2 you get density prop. to a^3. If you then plot a graph of density vs. scale factor it is a straight-forward graph. Good up until then, but then I got the interpretation wrong. This represents the "big rip". But how? I figured that as scale factor goes to infinity then density goes to infinity, an infinite density implied a "big crunch" to me. On further research, it seems the graph was correct, but I interpreted it wrong. Apparently an infinite energy density is needed for the "big rip", but I don't get why this is. How can an "infinite density" tear the universe apart?
Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KGC said:
Hello, in the eqn of state [density prop. to a^-3(W+1)] if you subbed in W=-2 you get density prop. to a^3. If you then plot a graph of density vs. scale factor it is a straight-forward graph. Good up until then, but then I got the interpretation wrong. This represents the "big rip". But how? I figured that as scale factor goes to infinity then density goes to infinity, an infinite density implied a "big crunch" to me. On further research, it seems the graph was correct, but I interpreted it wrong. Apparently an infinite energy density is needed for the "big rip", but I don't get why this is. How can an "infinite density" tear the universe apart?
Thanks for any help.

This might be a little late to help.

A big rip ocurs when the scale factor a goes to infinity at some *finite* time in the future. To show that this happens in this case, integrate the Friedmann equation to find the scale factor as a function of time.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top