How Does Light Diffract Around a Tiny Spherical Bead?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the diffraction of light around a tiny spherical steel bead with a diameter of 0.13 mm, suspended by a non-diffracting thread. Participants explore the resulting interference pattern, specifically the maxima for orders m=0,1,2,3, noting the absence of negative order maxima. The relationship between the phase of diffracted beams and their convergence along a central line is also examined. Additionally, questions arise regarding the wavelength of the incident light and the visual representation of the interference pattern, first in 2D and then in 3D. Overall, the interaction of light with the bead creates a unique diffraction pattern that differs from traditional double slit interference.
jimmy_neutron
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
A tiny spherical bead of steel bead is suspended by a special transparent thread that does not diffract light so that it has no effect on the interference pattern of the bead. Draw to scale the interference pattern created by the bead. The bead has a diameter of 0.13 mm. Include only
the m=0,1,2,3 maxima (Hint: notice there are no negative order maxima)

Would the interference pattern look like a double slit interference?
please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the wavelength of the incident light? Draw the 2-d version of this first (a 0.13mm wide block), and then extend it to 3-d...
 
Each point around the perimeter of the ball will diffract light around it. How will the phase of such diffracted beams relate to each other as they meet on the central line starting from the light source and running through the ball?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top