How does light travel through semi-opaque surfaces?

AI Thread Summary
Light travels through semi-opaque surfaces based on the amount absorbed or scattered, which is proportional to the opacity of the material. In the scenario of two headlights, one with a larger area and no lens and the other with a smaller area and a lens, the brightness remains the same if both are covered with the same thickness of dust. The lens does not increase the total amount of light escaping; it merely focuses the light, while the dirt affects both equally. Therefore, regardless of the surface area, the same amount of light will escape through both surfaces if the conditions are identical. Ultimately, the presence of a lens does not change the overall light output when dirt is involved.
kasykid
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So i was wondering...if you have 2 surfaces of different areas..one bigger and one smaller...and the one with a smaller area disperses light through a lens..does more light travel through the one with the lens or the other or does the same amount of light travel through both?

To get further details into this question and how I came to it. I was thinking if you have 2 cars, one with a big headlight that had no lenses in front of it and one with a lens but smaller headlight and the headlights get covered with the exact same amount of dust...(the same thickness on a square cm) will one car have brighter headlights or just the same?(of course you have the same exact light source in both of them)
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hi kasykid, :welcome:

Apart from the fact that there are no cars without a lens in front or a mirror behind the lamp (*):
Opaqueness is generally the fraction of the incoming light that gets absorbed (or scattered). So it all goes proportional and the ratio between the brightnesses doesn't change if the grime layers are the same thickness.

(*) the inverse square law would mean there isn't enough lighting in the desired direction.
 
BvU said:
Hi kasykid, :welcome:

Apart from the fact that there are no cars without a lens in front or a mirror behind the lamp (*):
Opaqueness is generally the fraction of the incoming light that gets absorbed (or scattered). So it all goes proportional and the ratio between the brightnesses doesn't change if the grime layers are the same thickness.

(*) the inverse square law would mean there isn't enough lighting in the desired direction.

Thanks for the welcome :D

I know all cars have a mirror behind the lamp but some have a lens in front of it and some don't(my car has only the plasticky(or glass) material that has some indents but no actual lens,but it does have the mirror behind it).

I am not sure if you understood my question...in my scenario I imagine that because the area that the light leaves through is smaller for the light with a lens...there might be "more" photons of light that can escape in a smaller area(making it brighter) and on the other side the same amount of light will try to escape through a bigger dirty area making it dimmer?

I am sorry if I can't explain the problem correctly, I am not a native English speaker and I guess I can't explain things as I should.

Maybe if you ignore my scenario completely and could say if you have 2 boxes...that are coated with reflective material on the inside and one has a whole side that is just normal glass that does not change light's path but is dirty and one that has only a small part of a side(50% for example) with a lens that is also dirty and both have a light source of the same power. would more light escape the one with the lens or the one with the glass pane(assuming that all light is concentrated in the lens and is not lost or something.
 
To first approximation it would be the same, since the "dirt" absorbs a fixed fraction of the light that passes through it.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top