How does mass come into play in this problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter N_L_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a scenario is presented where a soldier falls from a helicopter and creates a crater in the snow. The focus is on calculating the soldier's net acceleration during the impact and understanding the role of mass in this context. It is clarified that while mass influences the forces acting on the soldier, it is not necessary for calculating acceleration since initial and final speeds are known. The net acceleration can be determined without considering mass, as the forces balance out when the soldier comes to a stop. Overall, the discussion emphasizes that mass does not affect the acceleration calculation in this specific problem.
N_L_
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Where / how does mass come into the following problem?

A 180 [lb] soldier has an accident: He fell down from a helicopter hovering at 150 [ft] above a snow packed ground. The impact of his body created a 4.1 [meter] crater in the snow. Convert all units into MKS units and find:

a) His net acceleration in the snow [m/s^2] (assume constant)
b) the direction of this net acceleration


If I treat the soldier as just an object in free fall from the time he falls from the helicopter until the time he hits the ground I can find his final velocity just before hitting the ground. Knowing the depth of the crater and the velocity just before hitting the snow and at the bottom of the crater (zero) I thought that I could find his acceleration, but I do not see how mass comes into play here...When he hits the snow m*g will be greater than the normal force but he comes to a stop so the Fn and m*g are equal then...

Any thoughts / ideas would welcomed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since, as you point out, you have (or can figure out) the initial and final speed, you can find the acceleration. Mass is not needed for that calculation.
 
Thank you for the clarification.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top