How Does Melting Temperature Affect the Density of Vacancies in Copper?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density
Arran
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a crystal of copper with the f.c.c. structure. Suppose the energy costs for creating a one-atom vacancy in the material is 1.1eV. The melting temperature of the material is 1356K. Estimate equilibrium density of vacancies in the material.

Homework Equations



NV/NL=exp(-Δhf/kT)

where NV is the number of vacancies,
NL is the number of lattice sites,
Δhf is the energy required to create a one-atom vacancy,
& k is boltzmann's constant

The Attempt at a Solution



Equilibrium density of vacancies = NV/NL=exp(-Δhf/kT)=
=exp(-1.1*1.6*10-19/1.38*10-23*300)=3.45*10-19

I think I understand the equation and am able to derive it. However, I don't understand the relevance of the melting temperature. I assume the "equilibrium" implies room temperature, so I use T=300K. Also I don't see the relevance of the crystal structure, f.c.c.

Please help me. I feel as though I am missing the point of the equation :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm pretty sure for T you are supposed to use the melting point of copper i.e 1357.77K.
 
newyork7 said:
I'm pretty sure for T you are supposed to use the melting point of copper i.e 1357.77K.

But the formula implies (to me anyway) that the density of defects is temperature dependent, which makes sense. So as T goes to zero, so too does the density of defects. As T goes to infinity, the defect density goes to unity.

My only idea about the melting point is that at this temperature (T=1357.77K) the density of defects somehow saturates or reaches unity or some such. I don't see how to describe this with the given equation though. . .
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top