How Does Non-Standard Feedback Affect Op-Amp Behavior?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rudinhoob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Feedback Opamp
AI Thread Summary
In standard negative feedback configurations, op-amps maintain a small voltage difference between the inverting and non-inverting inputs, known as the virtual short concept, allowing for accurate amplification. However, when non-standard feedback is applied, such as connecting the inverting input to different circuit parts or using positive feedback, this concept may not hold, leading to non-linear behavior. Analyzing these configurations requires more complex techniques, including the op-amp's transfer function and consideration of its non-idealities. The circuit designer must ensure that the feedback allows the op-amp to operate correctly. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effective op-amp circuit design.
Rudinhoob
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
OpAmp "Non-standard" Feedback

Hello,

This is my first post here. Please excuse my poor English and grammar. I will try to make my questions clear.

As I understand, with a negative feedback, where the output connected to the inverting input and in the ideal case, the Vn and Vp will be very close in a sense that Vn tracks the voltage of Vp so that the difference is almost zero.
However, when changing the feedback configuration, for example connecting the Vn input to other parts than the output, or using a positive feedback, how does this affect the ideal rules in analysis?

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


That's a hard concept to wrap your brain around when first starting out.

The little integrated circuit we call an "op-amp" is just a high gain amplifier.

When we surround an "op-amp" with a feedback circuit that allows it to hold its inputs equal,
we now have an electronic circuit that behaves in accordance with some mathematical "operation" defined by the feedback network.
So we call it an 'operational amplifier' circuit.
Perhaps we could have done better with the naming comvention, perhaps not.

The circuit you describe , signal applied to +in and Vout connected to -in, performs the math operation Vout = Vin - 0.
More precisely, Vout = Vin(1-1/(amplifier's open loop gain)),
and since open loop gain is around a million that reduces to ~Vin - Vin/(106), whhich rounds to Vin - 0.

Remember - it is the duty of the circuit designer to surround his amplifier with a feedback circuit that allows it to hold its inputs equal.
Else it won't operate.


See if this is any help in your studies:
http://www.analog.com/static/import... Amp Applications Book (PDF)/P2 ChH_final.pdf

This site is a treasure trove:
http://www.philbrickarchive.org/

old jim
 
Last edited:


When we surround an "op-amp" with a feedback circuit that allows it to hold its inputs equal, we now have an electronic circuit that behaves in accordance with some mathematical "operation" defined by the feedback network.

How can we tell that a certain feedback configuration makes the two input voltages almost equal, and hence assume Vn = Vp?
 


Rudinhoob said:
How can we tell that a certain feedback configuration makes the two input voltages almost equal, and hence assume Vn = Vp?

What i do is write Kirchoff's voltage law solutions for voltage at each input, then set those equal and solve for Vout.
If Vout doesn't fall between the supply rails, the circuit won't "operate".
 


Hello,

Thank you for your question. As you correctly stated, in a standard negative feedback configuration, the output voltage is fed back to the inverting input of the op-amp, resulting in a very small difference between the inverting and non-inverting input voltages. This is known as the virtual short concept and allows for accurate amplification and linear operation of the op-amp.

When using non-standard feedback configurations, such as connecting the Vn input to other parts of the circuit or using positive feedback, the ideal rules for analysis may no longer apply. This is because the virtual short concept may not hold true in these cases and the op-amp may not behave in a linear manner.

In such cases, it is important to carefully analyze the circuit and take into account the effects of the non-standard feedback on the op-amp's behavior. This may require using more complex analysis techniques, such as using the op-amp's transfer function or considering the effects of non-idealities in the op-amp itself.

I hope this helps clarify your question. Please let me know if you have any further inquiries.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top