How Does Object Collision Work in Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OneCookie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movement Space
AI Thread Summary
In space, a large cube struck on its edge by a small, high-velocity object will not spin uniformly due to its scalar inertia tensor, resulting in wobbling motion. The collision's outcome depends on the precision of the impact; a precise hit could induce spin with slight drift, but generally, the cube will exhibit chaotic movement. The behavior contrasts with more complex shapes, like a book, where differing principal moments of inertia lead to intricate dynamics. Angular momentum remains constant, but angular velocity can vary, causing unpredictable motion. Overall, the large cube's response to collision is predominantly erratic rather than uniform.
OneCookie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Should an object for argument sake a cube be traveling in space at a stable rotation, if a small object traveling at a high velocity collided with the edge of the cube enough so that on Earth if fastened the cube would spin. in space however would this object spin/rotate in a single position or move awkwardly in a almost random direction. If so would the actions of the collision work when the small object colliding with the cube remains the same size yet the cube is 100x its size.

Random debate between friends, however neither of us have the knowledge required to actively agree with certainty on any particular point. if it requires any more explanation please let me know.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The object is a cube, so it presumably has a scalar inertia tensor. The behavior for such an object is rather uninteresting. If on the other hand the spaceship was a book (three different principal moments of inertia) the behavior is quite complex. Now you can get into a situation where angular velocity and angular momentum point in different directions. The object will exhibit all kinds of weird behavior. Angular momentum will still be constant, but angular velocity is not. As Goldstein put it, "The polhode rolls without slipping on the herpolhode lying in the invariable plane."
 
The object (large cube) in space if hit on its edge would not spin in any sort of uniform fashion.
Because its central axis is not tethered to any stationary object.
In 99.999% of instances the large cube would wobble about all over the place. But if you could hit the cube very very precisely you could get it to spin without wobbling, BUT it would drift ever so slightly.
 
solar71 said:
The object (large cube) in space if hit on its edge would not spin in any sort of uniform fashion.
A cube will do just that. You need at least one of the principle moments of inertia to differ from the other two to get any kind of interesting motion. But even then it won't be that interesting. Things only get really interesting when all three principal moments of inertia are different from one another.

The wobbling results from the (\mathbf I \vec{\omega})\times \vec{\omega} term in the torque-free equations of motion for a rigid body.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top