How does one calculate the distance (or length) on the ground

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pollock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ground Length
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the distance on the ground for one minute or second of arc at a specific latitude, one can start by assuming the Earth is a sphere, where the length of an arc segment is straightforward. However, for more accuracy, the Earth's shape as a geoid must be considered, particularly because the distance equivalent to a degree of longitude decreases as one approaches the poles. The arc length for one degree of latitude remains nearly constant across the Earth's surface, while longitude varies due to the Earth's curvature. The geodetic latitude is crucial for precise calculations, as it defines the angle between the equatorial plane and the normal to the Earth's surface. Accurate Earth radius values can be obtained from geodetic data sources.
Pollock
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
How does one calculate the distance (or length) on the ground suspended by one minute of arc (or one second of arc) at a particular point on the Earth's surface,given its latitude/longitude in degrees/ minutes /seconds ?.Where would one get the Earth radius of sufficient accuracy as a function of latitude ?.

Pollock
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


For a simple answer you can assume the Earth is a sphere then the length of an arc segment is failry simple to work out.

More complete answer require more terms to account for the Earth's shape (geoid) see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latitude
 


The distance on the ground equivalent to one degree of arc will be the same at any latitude (assuming the Earth as a perfect sphere).But this will not be so for the distance equivalent to a degree of longitude as circles of constant latitude get smaller towards the poles.How does one take account of this to calculate distance on the ground in terms of both latitude and longitude anywhereon the Earth's surface
 


Pollock said:
The distance on the ground equivalent to one degree of arc will be the same at any latitude (assuming the Earth as a perfect sphere).But this will not be so for the distance equivalent to a degree of longitude as circles of constant latitude get smaller towards the poles.How does one take account of this to calculate distance on the ground in terms of both latitude and longitude anywhereon the Earth's surface
The arc length of one degree change in latitude is very, very close to constant everywhere on the non-spherical surface of the Earth. The reason why is that latitude of a point on the surface is not the angle subtended between the Earth's equatorial plane and the line connecting the center of the Earth and the point in question. The latitude of a point is instead the angle subtended between the Earth's equatorial plane and the line defined by the normal to an idealization of the Earth's non-spherical surface. This angle is more precisely called the geodetic latitude of the point. The word "latitude" without a qualifier means geodetic latitude.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top