How Does Optical Activity Help Measure Sugar Concentration?

Kathi201
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
The sugar concentration in a solution can be measured conveniently by using the optical activity of sugar nad other asymmetric molecules. In general, an optically active molecule like sugar will rotate the plane of polarization through an angle that is proportional to the thickness of the sample and to the concentration of the molecule. To measure the concentration of a given solution, a sample of known thickness is placed between two polarizing filters that are at right angles to each other. The intensity of light transmitted through the two filters can be compared with a calibration chart to determine the concentration.

a. What percentage of the incident (unpolarized) light will pass through the first filter?

b. If no sample is present, what percentage of the initial light will pass through the second filter

c. When a particular sample is placed between the two filters, the intensity of light emerging from the second filter is 40.0% of the incident intensity. Through what angle did the sample rotate the plane of polarization?

d. A second sample has half the sugar concentration of the first sample. Find the intensity of the light emerging from the second filter in this case.

For a my guess would be that the percentage would be 50% of half of the light will pass through the first filter.
For b my guess is that it would be 0% because then it would be at a 90 degree angle and cosine of 90 = 0
I am not quite sure how to do c and d either

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kathi201 said:
For a my guess would be that the percentage would be 50% of half of the light will pass through the first filter.
For b my guess is that it would be 0% because then it would be at a 90 degree angle and cosine of 90 = 0
I am not quite sure how to do c and d either

a and b are correct answers. However, I'll point out that transmitted intensity depends on cos2θ. You still get 0 for a 90 degree angle, so it makes no difference in part b.

For c and d, use the fact that the transmitted intensity is
cos2θ
 
Use the Law of Malus!
I = I_o cos ^2 (theta)
so for part c it will be
.4 = .5 cos^2 (theta)
But you have to do 90-theta to get the real value. You can draw a diagram and you can see that doing arccos will give you the wrong angle value.
Part d you can do the law of malus again!
I2= ½(I0)cos2((90- (answer to part c/2)
You are solving for I2/I0. That should help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top