How Does Particle Decay Relate to the Speed of Resulting Particles?

fredrick08
Messages
374
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle at rest with mass M, decays into n identical smaller particles with equal mass, m. Show that speed of the particles is given by

u=c*root(1-(((n^2)(m^2))/M^2))


The Attempt at a Solution


this one i don't really know where to start, M has a rest energy... m's have Et=Eo+Ek so,

Mc^2=(n*mc^2)+(n*(1/2)mv^2)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lol that doesn't even make sense...
 
no one has any ideaS?
 
is it Mc^2=ynmc^2=>y=M/nm=>1/root(1-B^2)=M/nm=>B=root(1-(nm)^2/M^2)=v/c=>v=c*root(1-(nm)^2/M^2) this works out but can someone tell me why there is no kinetic energy part in the equation?? does ymc^2= total energy, because i thought it was just relativistic rest mass?
 
Well M would be the rest mass of the initial particle, m is the rest mass of the smaller particles, and M > nm. The total energy is conserved, and so is momentum.

It should be straightforward for two particles (colinear) and three particles (coplanar). Four or more starts getting complicated because momentum is in three dimensions.

Try with 2 particles (products), then 3.

Since the products are identical (m), there is some symmetry which is the key.


Has one considered E2 = p2c2 + m2c4
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top