How Does Particle Motion in a Negative Inverse Square Potential Evolve?

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
For a particle of mass m moving in a potential V(r) = -b/r^2 where the constant b>0 obtain the equation r = r(\phi} of the trajectory for the particular states of motion with total energy E = 0 and angular momenta such that \frac{L^2}{2m} < b
SKetch the trajectory and discuss the motion for
\dot{r} (t=0) >0 and
\dot{r} (t=0) <0

Ok so we know that phi and r are related by this equation
\phi = L \int \frac{1}{r^2 \sqrt{2m(E - V_{e} (r))}} dr + \mbox{constant}
here V_{e} (r) = \frac{-b}{r^2} + \frac{L^2}{2mr^2}
also E = 0 so
\phi = L \int \frac{1}{r^2 \sqrt{2m(\frac{b}{r^2} + \frac{L^2}{2mr^2}}}

and integrating we get
C exp(\phi \frac{\sqrt{2mb - \frac{L^2}{2m}}}{L}}) = r(\phi) = r

so far so good?

for the second part
\dot{r}(t) = \frac{1}{r} \sqrt{\frac{2}{m} (b - \frac{L^2}{2m}}
do i need to find explicit expression for r(t) and phi(t) ?
for r' > 0 then r > 0 and phi > 0
for r' < 0 from the relation between r and phi above it does nt look like that could ever be less that zero unless C <0? Do i need to solve for C by the way?

YOur help is always, greatly appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
heres the sketch that is missing from the question

thank you for your help!
 

Attachments

  • charge.JPG
    charge.JPG
    7.5 KB · Views: 424
can anyone help!

this is due tomorrow! I need to know if what i have is right... please please help! I am desperate!
Note that i posted it about 4 days in advance
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top