How Does Particle Size Affect Gas Laws in Hard Sphere Models?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jfy4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms Marble
jfy4
Messages
645
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


In a classical gas of hard spheres (of diameter D), the spatial distribution of the particles is no
longer uncorrelated. Roughly speaking, the presence of n particles in the system leaves only a volume (V − nv_0 ) available for the (n + 1)th particle; clearly, v_0 would be proportional to D^3. Assuming that Nv_0 \ll V, determine the dependence of \Omega(N,V,E) on V (compare to equation (1.4.1)) and show that, as a result of this, V in the ideal-gas law (1.4.3) gets replaced by (V − b), where b is four times the actual volume occupied by the particles.


Homework Equations


(1.4.1) \Omega (N,V,E) \propto V^N
(1.4.3) PV=NkT=nRT


The Attempt at a Solution


Well I took
<br /> (V-Nv_0)^N \approx V^N - N^2 v_0 V^{N-1}+...<br />
Then I tried to do something similar as to the construction of the ideal gas law by trying
<br /> \frac{P}{T}=k\frac{\partial \ln (\Omega)}{\partial V}\frac{\partial \Omega}{\partial V} <br />
assuming \Omega \propto V^N - N^2 v_0 V^{N-1} similar to the original derivation.
But to no success. So I'm stumped now. Please help.

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You got to \Omega \propto (V-Nv_0)^N, but when you think about it, this doesn't properly represent the situation - this actually represents putting a single particle into the remaining volume of the jar N times.

What you have to do is put one particle in, and then progressively add particles, one by one, with each successive particle having less and less space to occupy. Thus, the expression you need to begin with is \Omega \propto \prod_{n=0}^{N-1} (V-nv_0)

You can then use a logarithm to turn the product into a sum, make any needed simplifying assumptions, do all necessary manipulations to express the sum algebraically, which then let's you get a simple expression for \Omega.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top