How Does Permittivity Affect Energy Transmission in EM Waves?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the energy passing through a sphere in a nonmagnetic medium with a given permittivity and electric field amplitude. Two methods for calculating energy transmission are proposed: using the average power formula and integrating the Poynting vector over the sphere. The question of whether to replace the permittivity of free space with the medium's permittivity in calculations is raised. Clarification is provided that the sphere is simply a volume within a dielectric medium with ε=4. The conversation emphasizes the importance of integrating the Poynting vector for accurate energy transmission results.
diracdelta
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Sphere of a radius R=50 cm is in nonmagnetic medium of
permittivity ε=4. EM wave with amplitude of electric field Em= 200 V/m is spreading through the medium.
How much energy pass through surface of sphere through 1 minute?

I have couple of question here. Since the sphere is in nonmagnetic medium how will that reflects of her magnetic field?
She doesn't have one?

So here's next flow of mind.I thought of two possibilities.
1) Sav*A*T= ε0*c*E*T
Q: Should i replace ε0 with ε?
Calculating this is quite easy, not sure if correct.

2)
Lets integrate over whole sphere of radius R, to find total Energy/time, that is, total power.
P = ∫sphere Savg
this way is much longer as far as mathemathics, but in the end, it should turn out same.

Are both solutions good?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the sphere made of? Is it just a spherical volume within the e=4 dielectric, or metallic, or air, or ?
 
Its just spherical volume within e=4.
 
diracdelta said:
Its just spherical volume within e=4.
Consider integrating the poynting vector over the sphere's internal "great circle" cross-section.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top