How Does Photon Angular Momentum Influence Zeeman Effect Observations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Zeeman Effect, specifically regarding the absorption lines observed when circular polarized light interacts with atomic states 3S1 and 3P1 in a magnetic field. It is established that photons carry 1 unit of angular momentum due to their spin, which allows only transitions with a change in magnetic quantum number (delta Mj) of 1 to be observed. Circular polarized light is significant as it enables specific transitions that adhere to the selection rules of dipole radiation. However, it is concluded that exciting the atoms to the Mj=-1 state of the 3S1 state is not possible under these conditions, as the selection rules restrict transitions to those with Mj values of 1 or 0. The constraints of the Zeeman Effect and photon angular momentum are critical to understanding the observed phenomena.
secret2
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Currently working on a problem about Zeeman Effect. Consider two states, 3S1 and 3P1, each of which is a triplet under the effect of an external B field in the z direction. 3P1 is the ground state.

If we shine a beam of circular polarized light, incident along a direction parallel to the B field, to the atoms, it is said that only 2 absorption lines among the 7 allowed transition lines (considering only dipole radiation) will be observed.

The answer says that only two lines are observed because the photon carry 1 unit of angular mometum, hence only those lines with (delta Mj)=1, namely the Mj=1 and Mj=0 states of 3S1, can be seen. I have 3 questions:

1. What is the proof of the claim that "photon carry 1 unit of angular mometum"?
2. What is the significance of having circular polarized light in this particular problem?
3. How can we, if possible after all, excite the atoms to the remaining state?(i.e. Mj=-1 of 3S1 state)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


1. The proof that photons carry 1 unit of angular momentum comes from the fact that they exhibit properties of both particles and waves. In quantum mechanics, particles are described by their wavefunctions, which can have a specific angular momentum value. The angular momentum of a photon is given by its spin, which is always equal to 1 in units of the reduced Planck constant. This spin value is the same for all photons, regardless of their frequency or energy. Therefore, it can be said that photons carry 1 unit of angular momentum.

2. The significance of using circular polarized light in this problem is that it has a specific polarization state, which is determined by the direction of its electric field. Circular polarized light has both a magnetic and an electric field component, and their directions are perpendicular to each other. This specific polarization state allows for the selection of specific transition lines in the Zeeman effect, as only transitions with a change in angular momentum of 1 can occur.

3. It is not possible to excite the atoms to the remaining state (Mj=-1 of 3S1 state) in this particular problem. This is because the selection rules for dipole radiation state that the change in angular momentum (delta Mj) must be equal to 0 or +/-1. Since the initial state (3P1) has a Mj value of 0, the only allowed transitions are to states with Mj values of 1 or -1. Therefore, it is not possible to excite the atoms to the Mj=-1 state of the 3S1 state using circular polarized light.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top