How Does Plate Alignment Affect Capacitance in Variable Capacitors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pc2-brazil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Variable
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how plate alignment in a variable capacitor affects its capacitance. The variable capacitor consists of interleaved plates, with one set fixed and the other set able to rotate, impacting the effective capacitance. The expected maximum capacitance formula indicates that the plates should be considered in parallel, contrary to the initial assumption of them being in series. Each pair of opposing plates creates a separate capacitor, contributing to the overall capacitance when aligned properly. Understanding this configuration is crucial for accurately calculating capacitance in radio device applications.
pc2-brazil
Messages
198
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The figure (attached) shows a variable capacitor which uses air as the dielectric, of the kind used in the syntonization of radio devices. The plates are connected alternately; a group of them is fixed, while the other group can rotate around an axis. Consider a set of n plates of alternated polarity, each one of them having an area A and separated by the distance d. Show that the maximum value of the capacitance is:
C = \frac{(n-1)\epsilon_0 A}{d}

2. The attempt at a solution
It seems that there are (n - 1) plates in series, but this wouldn't lead to the expected result. According to the expected result, the capacitors would have to be in parallel, then, the maximum capacitance would occur when the movable plates aren't rotated with respect to the fixed plates. But it doesn't seem that they are in parallel. Could someone explain?

Thank you in advance.
 

Attachments

  • pf.jpg
    pf.jpg
    27.2 KB · Views: 439
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think that the plates are in series? Can you draw a circuit diagram that corresponds to the scenario?
 
gneill said:
Why do you think that the plates are in series? Can you draw a circuit diagram that corresponds to the scenario?
The plates appear to be in series because each capacitor shares a plate with the adjacent one.
 
pc2-brazil said:
The plates appear to be in series because each capacitor shares a plate with the adjacent one.

But the plates are connected externally. There are two sets of plates that are interleaved. Each set is connected so that they share the same potential. Each plate "opposes" one or two plates of the opposite set. Each pair of 'opposing' plate surfaces represents a separate capacitor.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top