How Does Polarizer Orientation Affect Light Intensity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the intensity of light after passing through two polarizers oriented at an angle of 40 degrees relative to each other. The initial intensity of unpolarized light is given as 176 Cd. The user initially misapplies values, using 28 Cd and 6 degrees instead of the correct figures. The confusion arises from the application of Malus' Law and the incorrect summation of intensities after each polarizer. Clarification is needed on using the correct initial intensity and angle to solve the problem accurately.
Babylady247
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Unpolarized light from an incandescent lamp has an intensity 176 Cd as measured by a light meter. What is the intensity reading on the meter when two ideal are inserted between the bulb and the meter with their axis of polarization making an angle of θ = 40.0° relative to each other? Express your answer in Cd.


am having some trouble with this problem. Here's what I have so far:

Known info:

Io=28 Cd

Theta= 6o

There are two polarizers, so theta1=6 and theta2=6

Equations:

I= Io/2

Malus' Law: I= Iocos^2theta

Work:

I used this to try and solve and it is wrong...

I = 28/2

I=14

Then

I = 28(cos6)^2 which = 27.7 (at theta1)

but there are two polarizers so 27.7 becomes the new Io for theta2

I=27.7(cos6)^2 which =27.4

So you add them right? 27.7+27.4 which = 55.1?

Where am I getting confused?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

For starters, the problem statement says 176 Cd and 40.0 degrees. Why are you using 28 Cd and 6 degrees when you work out the problem?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top