How Does Quantum Mechanics Describe Momentum in Three Dimensions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter varunag
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
varunag
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
In our Quantum mechanics course we were told that the wave function can be projected in the momentum space by taking the Fourier transform of the projection of the wave function in the coordinate space. This was shown in one-dimension as:
\langle p|\psi \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \langle p|x \rangle \langle x|\psi \rangle dx

But, how do we write if we hve to write in three dimensions?
i.e.
\langle \vec{p}|\psi \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \langle \vec{p}|\vec{r} \rangle \langle \vec{r}|\psi \rangle dx
Here I'm confused as to what is \langle \vec{p}|\vec{r} \rangle ?
If I write \vec{p} = p_x \hat{i} + p_y \hat{j} + p_z \hat{k}
and \vec{r} = x \hat{i} + y \hat{j} + z \hat{k}
then should the terms like, \langle p_y|x \rangle crop up in the final result?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In 3 dimensions, the position operator \hat{x} is conventionally denoted by \hat{r} (since the position vector in 3-space is denoted by \vec{r}). Having said that you can still use \hat{x} with the understanding that \hat{x} has three components and that the integral you have written down has to be carried out over each of the 3 spatial coordinates.

Using \hat{r}, I will write this as

\langle p|\psi\rangle = \int d^{3}\vec{r} \langle p|r\rangle \langle r|\psi\rangle

Now, I can use

\langle r|p \rangle = \frac{1}{(2\pi \hbar)^{3/2}}\exp\left(\frac{i}{\hbar}{\vec{p}\bullet \vec{r}}\right)

But I think what you wanted to ask was the significance of the quantity \langle x|p_{y}\rangle.

EDIT: To do it rigorously, you can use linearity of the inner product:

\langle \alpha_{1} + \alpha_{2} | \beta_{1} \rangle = \langle \alpha_{1} | \beta_{1} \rangle + \langle \alpha_{2} | \beta_{1}\rangle

with suitable number of terms, using the expansion of the position and momentum operators in terms of their x, y, z components and then using the expressions for \langle x|p_{x}\rangle, and so on. You will get the cross term \langle x|p_{y}\rangle in such an expression.
 
Last edited:
The result you have given is known, but I don't know how the result came. i.e. how do we write:
\langle \vec{p}|\vec{r} \rangle = \langle p_x|x \rangle \langle p_y|y \rangle \langle p_z|z \rangle?
 
varunag said:
The result you have given is known, but I don't know how the result came. i.e. how do we write:
\langle \vec{p}|\vec{r} \rangle = \langle p_x|x \rangle \langle p_y|y \rangle \langle p_z|z \rangle?

This follows from the generalization of the Fourier Transform in 3 dimensions. Specifically,

\psi(\vec{r}) = \frac{1}{(2\pi\hbar)^{3/2}} \int d^{3}\vec{p} \exp\left(-\frac{i}{\hbar}\vec{p}\bullet\vec{r}\right)\phi(\vec{p})

\phi(\vec{p}) = \frac{1}{(2\pi\hbar)^{3/2}} \int d^{3}\vec{r} \exp\left(\frac{i}{\hbar}\vec{p}\bullet\vec{r}\right)\psi(\vec{r})

You can write this in Dirac notation easily.

Note: The result is consistent with the fact that [x_{l},p_{m}] = i\hbar \delta_{l,m}.

EDIT: This can be derived by inserting complete sets of states, i.e. writing \langle \vec{p}|\vec{r}\rangle as an integral (multiple integral) over basis states corresponding to the different x, y, z components of p and r.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top