How does quantum pseudo-telepathy work, as a quantum circuit?

Strilanc
Science Advisor
Messages
612
Reaction score
229
I'm trying to understand the wikipedia article on quantum pseudotelepathy. I've been trying to figure out the quantum circuits the players can use to win the game from the wiki article.

(Level of knowledge: Everything I know about quantum physics is from the computer science side. I can explain how Grover's algorithm works and understand quantum logic circuits, but I have no idea how those map to the underlying physics or what an observable is or how eigen values relate to observables or how wavefunctions come into things or etc.)

My main stumbling point is what the heck is going on in the center column and row. For example, here's my current terrible guess at a circuit (using this online simulator) for the center column:

gLz55.png


In the above circuit q1 is understood to be entangled with an unseen q1' to be used as part of a corresponding circuit for one of the rows, and the same for q2 and q2'. The circuit is xoring together the X, Y, and Z rotations of the input qubits and using that output to determine the values to place in the cells of the column.

This circuit doesn't work. I know it doesn't work because it's never mixing anything; never taking advantage of superpositions. It could be simulated classically, and the game can't be won with certainty classically.

So... I'm lost. A link to a more introductory explanation would be great. I'm pretty sure I'm missing something related to the pauli XYZ matrices satisfying XYZ = -iI, and rotations in 3d being order-dependent, but I don't know where to apply those facts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Found the answers on my own.

I found this paper really helpful: http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0407221.pdf .

It gives that actual unitary matrices that the entangled bell states must be transformed by (i.e. the gates to apply in each case) in section 5.2. I wrote a program to go through all the possibilities and those matrices are indeed a winning strategy. No idea what they have to do with pauli matrices, though...

Here's a screenshot of the relevant content:

mh9qS.png
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top