How Does Relativistic Speed Affect Photon Wavelength Measurement?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the wavelength of a photon torpedo as measured by a Klingon ship, given its initial wavelength of 616 nm on the Enterprise and a relative speed of 0.71c. The participant initially attempted to use length contraction equations, leading to confusion about the correct approach. The correct method involves applying the Doppler shift formula, which accounts for the relative motion between the two ships. The expected observed wavelength by the Klingon ship is 254 nm. The conversation highlights a misunderstanding of relativistic effects and the nature of photon torpedoes.
ivykink
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Spaceship Enterprise fires a photon torpedo at an approaching Klingon ship that has just decloaked. If the wavelength of this light beam as measured on the Enterprise is 616 nm what is the wavelength (in nm) as measured by the Klingon ship if the relative speed between the two space ships is u/c = 0.71?


Homework Equations



As far as I am concerned I have been working with L=Lo√1-u2/c2


The Attempt at a Solution



I am a little confused with the question as I am not exactly sure what is happening, this is what I have been doing L=616nm√1-.712 to get 433.8nm as the observed wavelength of the photon.

Now I am kinda confused with regard to the launching of the photon. It is my understanding that if it is a photon it would be moving at the speed of light toward the klingon ship? I am a little lost with how to approach the problem.
the answer is apparently 254nm.

Thank you for your assistance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be thinking in terms of Doppler shift rather than length contraction.

(On a side note, what are they teaching in schools these days? Everyone knows that a Photon torpedo is not made of photons, but is a casing containing an antimatter charge and propelled by a small warp engine.)
 
Thank you Janis :-) I had a feeling is was using the wrong relativity equations.

ps I think they are waiting for us to understand the foundation physics before introducing us to antimatter weapons and light speed travel ;-)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top