How Does Signal Speed Change with Movement in Parallel Paths?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ktoz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the time it takes for a signal to travel between two points on parallel lines, given their movement. When both points are at rest, the travel time is t. If both points move in the same direction at speed t/m, the time remains t in a stationary coordinate frame. For sound waves, a formula involving the distance and relative motion is derived, leading to a solution for the travel time based on their velocities. The conversation concludes with the user confirming the effectiveness of the second formula for their Doppler shift program.
ktoz
Messages
170
Reaction score
12
Hi

I'm sure this is an easy one, but I've managed to thoroughly confuse myself. Basically I'm trying to come up with a formula to determine how long a signal takes to travel from point a to point b.

Here are the givens:

a and b lie on parallel lines where the distance between the lines is d and a line drawn from a to b is perpendicular to both lines.

if a and b are at rest, the time it takes a signal to go from a to b is t

if a and b are moving in the same direction at speed t/m, how long would it take a signal from a to reach b?

This seems like a simple right triangle relationship but I can't seem to figure it out.

Any help appreciated.P.S. This isn't homework. It's for part of a Doppler shift program I'm writing.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What kind of "signal" are you talking about? If this is a electromagnetic signal (e.g. light or radio) then, since the everything can be done relative to a coordinate frame in which one (and therefore both, since they move in the same direction at the same speed) is stationary, the time would be t, exactly the same as when both are at rest (which they are in this frame).

If the signal is a sound wave, in a medium in which the speed of sound is v0= d/t, then set up a coordinate system in which the origin of the signal is at (0,0) and the receiver is initially at (0, d). If they are both moving with velocity u, then at time T, the receiver will be at (uT,d). In order that the signal be received then, we must have the distance from (0, 0) to (uT, d) equal to v0T= dT/t. That is \sqrt{u^2T^2+ d^2}= dT/t or u^2T^2+ d^2= d^2T^2/t^2 or ((d^2/t^2)- u^2)T^2= d^2. Solve that for T.
 
The signal is abstract. Could be a tennis ball shot from air gun, an image of a clock, a yak with a jet pack, whatever. The second formula was what I was looking for. I plotted it out in Adobe Illustrator and it works perfectly.

Thanks HallsOfIvy
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top