I How does spin relate to the symmetry of a particle?

kregg87
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Why are particle with half integer spins anti-symmetric while integer spin particles are symmetric? Or in other words, how does spin relate to the symmetry of indentical particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the spin statistics theorem. Google will find many references (it's hard to overstate its importance) but I am not aware of any proofs that work for an I-level thread.

One thing you do want to be clear about (you may already know this, but it's not certain from your post): The symmetry and anti-symmetry we're referring to is a property of many-particle systems. If the wave function of the entire system changes sign when any two particles are exchanged, we say that is is anti-symmetric, while if the wave function is unchanged we say it is symmetric.
 
I'd say the proof in Weinberg's, Quantum theory of fields is the best one in the sense that it treats the general case of any spin. That's A level. In most other textbooks you find the treatment of the most simple cases of spin 0, 1/2, and 1 (relevant for the elementary particles in the Standard Model), which is I level. In Germany the introduction to QFT is in the advanced undergraduate course (leading towards an MSc degree).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top