How Does State Space Design Compare to Classical PID Controllers?

AI Thread Summary
State space design offers advantages for managing complex MIMO and non-linear systems, providing a framework that captures interrelated outputs more effectively than classical PID controllers. It does not completely replace PID controllers; instead, it often works alongside them. In practice, a central MIMO state space model is used to address the system's complexity, while simpler classical control methods can be applied to individual inputs and outputs. This hybrid approach allows for more comprehensive control strategies. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for effective controller design in advanced systems.
MikeSv
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone.

Iam just Learning about State space representation and controller design and have a fundamental question about the difference between classical Control theory and modern Control theory.

I understood the state space is of advantage when dealing with MIMO systems or non-linear systems, but:

What exactly is state space design? Does it replace i.ex. a classical PID controller?

Thanks in advance,

kind regards,

Michael
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Complicated systems are often a mixture of approaches. There are usually several outputs that need to be controlled and they are interrelated. The central controller of a MIMO system can not be analysed as a simple PID controller. The physics of the system may include relationships between states that are hard to represent without a state space model. That forces you to include a central MIMO state space model. But the individual inputs and outputs of that model may be simpler. That leads you to surrounding your MIMO state space model with several classical Laplace transforms which pre-process the individual inputs and post-process the outputs.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top