How Does Stokes' Theorem Relate to Vorticity in Fluid Dynamics?

coverband
Messages
170
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider an imaginary circular disc, of radius R, whose arbitrary orientation is described by the unit vector, \vec {n}, perpendicular to the plane of the disc. Define the component, in the direction \vec {n}, of the angular velocity, \vec {\Omega}, at a point in the fluid by \vec {\Omega}. \vec {n} = \lim_{R \rightarrow 0}[\frac {1}{2 \pi R^2} \oint_C \vec {u}.dl], where C denotes the the boundary (rim) of the disc. Use Stokes' theorem, and the arbitrariness of \vec {n}, to show that \vec {\Omega}= \frac {1}{2} \vec {\omega}, where \vec {\omega} = \nabla * \vec {u} is the vorticity of the fluid at R=0. [This definition is based on a description applicable to the rotation of solid bodies. Confirm this by considering \vec {u} = \vec {U} + \vec {\Omega}* \vec{r}, where \vec {U} is the translational velocity of the body, \vec {\Omega} is its angular velocity and \vec {r} is the position vector of a point relative to a point on the axis of rotation.]


Homework Equations


Stokes' theorem : \oint_c u.dl = \iint_S (\nabla * u) .n ds


The Attempt at a Solution


Either 1.:
C is boundary of x^2 + y^2 = R^2. Parametrically x= Rcost, y = Rsint
dx = -Rsintdt, dy = Rcostdt
L.H.S. of Stokes becomes \oint_c udx + vdy + wdz
= \oint_C -uRSintdt + vRCostdt
=\int_{0}^{2 \pi} -uRSint dt + vRCost dt
=uRCost + vRSint \right]_{0}^{2 \pi}
= -uR - uR
=-2uR
multiply term outside integral
=-\frac{u}{\pi R}

Or 2:
\frac {1}{2} (\nabla * \vec {u}). \vec {n} = \lim_{R \rightarrow 0}[\frac {1}{2 \pi R^2} \iint_S (\nabla * u) .n ds ], ...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


[ Nevermind :) .. I was wrong. ]
 


Start with this

<br /> \vec {\Omega}. \vec {n} = \lim_{R \rightarrow 0}[\frac {1}{2 \pi R^2} \oint_C \vec {u}.dl] <br />

then use Stokes theorem and get in the limit R \rightarrow 0

<br /> \vec {\Omega}. \vec {n} = \lim_{R \rightarrow 0}[\frac {1}{2 \pi R^2} \iint_S (\nabla * u) .n ds ] = \lim_{R \rightarrow 0}[\frac {1}{2 \pi R^2} (\nabla * u) \pi R^2 ] = 0.5 \nabla * u<br />
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top