How Does String Tension Affect Audio Output Amplitude in Synthesizers?

AI Thread Summary
String tension significantly influences audio output amplitude in synthesizers, particularly during the excitation phase when a string is plucked or struck. The initial increase in tension leads to a slight pitch bend and alters inharmonicity, which then stabilizes as the note decays. A proposed model suggests a direct relationship between tension increase and audio amplitude, but the exact nature of this relationship remains uncertain. The rapid decay of tension post-excitation is crucial for understanding how potential energy translates into sound. Further research and multiple data points are necessary to accurately model these dynamics.
mikejm
Messages
40
Reaction score
2
I am working on a guitar/piano synthesizer for my own interest. When a string is plucked or struck, tension increases causing a slight pitch bend and change in the inharmonicity. This change then settles as the note quiets down. Thus it is important to model how the tension rises above baseline when a note is struck and evolves.

I have put a lot of thought into it and my presumption is that the tension increase from excitation must vary in some fairly direct manner with the amplitude of the total audio output signal of the string.

Let's say a string has a resting tension of 70 N with a resting audio signal output of amplitude 0. Let's say you then calibrate the simulation so an output amplitude of 1 corresponds to a tension increase to 72 N. Would there be a linear relationship between the tension and the amplitude changes, so that at an output of 0.5 there would be 71 N tension expected?

If not, how would the relationship likely work?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now I'm actually thinking of it from a different perspective.

The tension that is increased at the point of plucking or striking a string is the potential energy that then creates the audio output, right?

So actually the tension should decay very rapidly back to the baseline as the sound "explodes" from plucking it.

I wonder if there's any way to model how quickly the tension would decay based on things like string diameter, tension, linear mass, etc.
 
Did you really mean inharmonicity? I would have guessed that wouldn't be significantly influenced by how hard you pluck a string.
 
http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~jw12/JW%20PDFs/Guitar_II.pdf

That paper discusses the issues you ask about. I found it with an Internet search for "plucked string design".
 
And you would need significantly more than a single data point to test your theory.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top