How does subtracting a row from another affect the determinant?

AI Thread Summary
Subtracting one row from another in a matrix can affect the determinant, but the operation must be interpreted correctly. In this discussion, the determinant was initially calculated as 0.8, but confusion arose when subtracting the fourth row from the third row, leading to a claim that the determinant changed to -0.8. The correct interpretation of the row operation shows that it should not alter the determinant's value if done properly. The participants clarify that the determinant remains 0.8, as the resulting triangular matrix's diagonal entries dictate the determinant's value. Accurate calculations and interpretations of row operations are crucial for determining the correct determinant.
fleeceman10
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I think I have broken maths. I am reducing a matrix to row echelon form to find the determinant. The matrix I will show is nearly in the desired form


Homework Equations


1 -3 -2 1
0 1 2 -1
0 0 1 -0.8
0 0 1 0


The Attempt at a Solution


As it stands, the determinant is 0.8. However subtracting the 4th row from the 3rd row changes the determinant to -0.8. I thought adding multiples of one row to another left the determinant unchanged. So why hasn't it? Thanks for answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doing that leaves the determinant at +0.8.

Det(The matrix)=det(The matrix without the first row and first column)=det(The matrix without the first and second row and the first and second column).

I arrive at that from expansion along the first column twice.

So you arrive at det(The matrix)=(1)(0)-(1)(-0.8)=0.8

Subtracting the row like you said just zaps that first 1 to 0 making it (0)(0)-(1)(-0.8)=0.8.

Check your calculation again.
 
Pagan Harpoon said:
Doing that leaves the determinant at +0.8.

Det(The matrix)=det(The matrix without the first row and first column)=det(The matrix without the first and second row and the first and second column).

I arrive at that from expansion along the first column twice.

So you arrive at det(The matrix)=(1)(0)-(1)(-0.8)=0.8

Subtracting the row like you said just zaps that first 1 to 0 making it (0)(0)-(1)(-0.8)=0.8.

Check your calculation again.

Am I correct in thinking that the matrix obtained doing this calculation (3rd row - 4th row) is this
1 | -3 | -2 | 1
0 | 1 | 2 | -1
0 | 0 | 1 | -0.8
0 | 0 | 0 | -0.8

Since this is a triangular matrix, the determinant is the product of the entries on the leading diagonal, -0.8. Where have I gone wrong?
 
You originally said subtracting the 4th from the 3rd, which would make the bottom corner

0 -0.8
1 0

That is how I would usually interpret subtracting the 4th from the 3rd row, anyway.

So you mean what I would call subtracting the 3rd from the 4th row. You have done the calculation incorrectly, the bottom right entry should be +0.8 because it is 0-(-0.8).
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top