How Does Tape Width and Spool Radius Affect Angular Velocity in Tape Recorders?

  • Thread starter Thread starter N2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
In tape recorders, the angular velocity of the spool decreases as the tape winds, maintaining a constant linear velocity at the recording head. The relationship between angular velocity, tape width, and spool radius is critical, with the angular acceleration being negative as the radius increases. The discussion emphasizes the need to express angular velocity in terms of the tape's width, initial radius, and the velocity at the recording head. A method to derive this involves rewriting angular velocity as a function of radius and integrating to find a relationship over time. The conversation also touches on potential dimensional inconsistencies in the derived equations, highlighting the importance of careful unit analysis.
N2
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hello, I've just started a mechanics course, and i don't quiet know how to start with this assignment:

In a taperecorder the information to pass the recording head with constant velocity. Therefore is has to rotate with decreasing velosity as the empty wind is getting filled.

What is the spools angular velocity, \omega, as function of
b, the tape's width
r_0, radius of the empty wind
v_0, velocity at the recording head
t, time

My first thought was, that the angular acceleration must be constant, but how does this help? and how can i solve this problem?

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For clarification, I believe that b is the tapes thickness. So in that case, the radius is increasing by b with each revolution, or dr = b.

The linear velocity must be constant, so the angular velocity \omega= v/r must be decreasing as r increases (proportional to r). If the angular velocity has to decrease, what does this say about the angular acceleration?
 
You are right; b is thickness.
If the angular velocity decreases then the acceleration is negative. But is your point that a. acceleration, d\omega, is proportional dr and therefore to b ?
 
Astronuc said:
So in that case, the radius is increasing by b with each revolution, or dr = b.
dr is only an infinitisimal quantity, while b is finite. I think you mean to say \frac{dr}{d \theta} = \frac{b}{2 \pi}. This seems to be a good way to start the problem.
 
LeonhardEuler said:
dr is only an infinitisimal quantity, while b is finite. I think you mean to say \frac{dr}{d \theta} = \frac{b}{2 \pi}. This seems to be a good way to start the problem.
Something like that, yes.

So one has to work out \omega = d\theta/dt in terms of r and differentiate to get acceleration.

Therefore is has to rotate with decreasing velosity as the empty wind is getting filled.
Implies that the angular acceleration is negative, because angular velocity must be decreasing while the radius is increase in order to maintain a constant linear velocity.
 
I don't think finding the acceleration is important to this problem. It asks to find \omega in terms of the other variables. The way I solved it was to write the equation as dr=\frac{b}{2\pi}d\theta and then divide by dt to make \omega appear. Then after separation of variables, integration, etc. you get an answer. Maybe there is a simpler way, though.
 
LeonhardEuler said:
... divide by dt to make \omega appear. Then after separation of variables, integration, etc. you get an answer.
integrating the equation containing \omega - wouldn that just give you an expression for \theta ?
 
N2 said:
integrating the equation containing \omega - wouldn that just give you an expression for \theta ?
Not the way I did it. I re-wrote \omega as \frac{v}{r}. Then, since v is constant, I just separated variables and got an expression for r in terms of t.
 
ok thank you.
the expression i end up with is now
\omega (t) = \frac{v_0}{ \sqrt{b/ \pi \cdot v_0 t + r_0}}[/itex]<br /> but isent there i dimension problem with the units?<br /> <br /> [s^{-1}] = \frac{[m/s]}{\sqrt{[m] [m/s] &lt;s&gt; + [m]}}&lt;/s&gt;<s> <br /> dosent seem to add up? (the problem being r_0)</s>
 
  • #10
Yes, re-check the work you did to find the value of the constant after you integrated. I get r_0^2
 
  • #11
Another way might be to start with both reels with the same amount of tape, both moving the same velocity, say 1 inch per second at the recording head.


Assume 1 ips, then what's the starting radius? It can't be the center because there is a hub. Imagine its exactly 1" radius from the center of the reel. So at 1 ips, with 1 inch from center, assume it can never change velocity because the reels are always equal, to get an initial calculation.

If you start with a 1" radius you would add the tape thickness and recalculate for every revolution. The other reel isn't necessarily going the inverse speed, if that reel starts its overlap at some different part of rotation.

The speed of the reel changes on the thickness of the tape. Constantly? Or only at the time the tape overlaps? It has to be when the tape overlaps, it accelerates up to the thickness of the tape then is constant until the next revolution.

Imagine the reel is 5 feet in diameter and the tape is 1 inch thick, it winds on to the takeup side then overlaps, now the radius is changed by 1 inch and moves slower. It would probably increase, overshoot, then correct each rotation to the current radius +1 tape thickness
 
Last edited:
Back
Top