How Does the Definition of Arc Length Lead to Its Integral Formula?

seanc12
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Confirm that th definition of th arc length ds^{2}=dr.dr leads to the formula
L=\int_{C}\frac{dr}{dt}dt

Homework Equations


\frac{dr}{dt}=\frac{dx}{dt}+\frac{dy}{dt}+\frac{dz}{dt}dt

The Attempt at a Solution


I am really unsure of what to do here. I have tried starting at each of the given equations and trying to meet somewhere in the middle. I won't post all my working becauses most if it is gibberish and I am still trying to get this LaTeX thing to work properly for me. Can someone give me some hints in what I am trying to get here.

the best I've gotten is expanding the dot product to get

ds^2=dx^2+dy^2+dz^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since nothing at all is said about xyz-coordinates in the original problem, I don't see why you are changing to dx, dy, and dz.

(And certainly dr/dt= dx/dt+ dy/dt+ dz/dt is NOT true. What is true is that
\frac{dr}{dt}= \sqrt{\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{dz}{dt}\right)^2})

From ds^2= dr\cdot\dr, take the square root of both sides.
 
Hi HallsofIvy, thanks for the reply.
(And certainly dr/dt= dx/dt+ dy/dt+ dz/dt is NOT true
Yes ofcourse, how could i have been so silly :P wasn't paying attention properly thanks for pointing that out.

<br /> \frac{dr}{dt}= \sqrt{\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{dz}{dt}\right)^2}<br />
I understand the RHS, but howcome it is = to dr/dt instead of ds/dt?

Also as a note, the C on the integral should be a subscript but it doesn't seem to want to go there
 
seanc12 said:
Also as a note, the C on the integral should be a subscript but it doesn't seem to want to go there

You need to put the entire expression in one set of tex tags, e.g. \int_a^b dx gives:
\int_a^b dx

seanc12 said:
I understand the RHS, but howcome it is = to dr/dt instead of ds/dt?

That's the magnitude of dr/dt in terms of dx,dy,and dz.
 
\int_C \frac{d <u>r</u>}{dt}dt

Thanks,

So from there can i go ahead and substitute the \frac{d <u>r</u>}{dt} back into the integral? or am i missing a few steps? It seems a little easy. Also, where does the C come into it?
 
Last edited:
Also, howcome the underlines don't show up in my LaTeX?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top