How Does the Definition of Arc Length Lead to Its Integral Formula?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of arc length and its connection to the integral formula for calculating length along a curve. Participants are exploring the mathematical relationships involved in expressing arc length in terms of derivatives and integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to connect the definition of arc length with its integral representation but expresses uncertainty about the steps involved. Some participants question the validity of certain equations and suggest clarifications regarding the relationships between differentials.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing hints and corrections. There is a focus on understanding the correct expressions for derivatives and their implications for the integral formula. Some guidance has been offered regarding LaTeX formatting and mathematical notation.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of clarity regarding the use of coordinates and the assumptions underlying the problem setup. The original poster also mentions difficulties with LaTeX formatting, which may affect the clarity of their expressions.

seanc12
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Confirm that th definition of th arc length ds[tex]^{2}[/tex]=dr.dr leads to the formula
L=[tex]\int[/tex][tex]_{C}[/tex][tex]\frac{dr}{dt}[/tex]dt

Homework Equations


[tex]\frac{dr}{dt}[/tex]=[tex]\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{dy}{dt}[/tex]+[tex]\frac{dz}{dt}[/tex]dt

The Attempt at a Solution


I am really unsure of what to do here. I have tried starting at each of the given equations and trying to meet somewhere in the middle. I won't post all my working becauses most if it is gibberish and I am still trying to get this LaTeX thing to work properly for me. Can someone give me some hints in what I am trying to get here.

the best I've gotten is expanding the dot product to get

ds^2=dx^2+dy^2+dz^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since nothing at all is said about xyz-coordinates in the original problem, I don't see why you are changing to dx, dy, and dz.

(And certainly dr/dt= dx/dt+ dy/dt+ dz/dt is NOT true. What is true is that
[tex]\frac{dr}{dt}= \sqrt{\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{dz}{dt}\right)^2}[/tex])

From [itex]ds^2= dr\cdot\dr[/itex], take the square root of both sides.
 
Hi HallsofIvy, thanks for the reply.
(And certainly dr/dt= dx/dt+ dy/dt+ dz/dt is NOT true
Yes ofcourse, how could i have been so silly :P wasn't paying attention properly thanks for pointing that out.

[tex] \frac{dr}{dt}= \sqrt{\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2+ \left(\frac{dz}{dt}\right)^2}[/tex]
I understand the RHS, but howcome it is = to dr/dt instead of ds/dt?

Also as a note, the C on the integral should be a subscript but it doesn't seem to want to go there
 
seanc12 said:
Also as a note, the C on the integral should be a subscript but it doesn't seem to want to go there

You need to put the entire expression in one set of tex tags, e.g. [tex]\int_a^b dx[/tex] gives:
[tex]\int_a^b dx[/tex]

seanc12 said:
I understand the RHS, but howcome it is = to dr/dt instead of ds/dt?

That's the magnitude of [itex]dr/dt[/itex] in terms of dx,dy,and dz.
 
[tex]\int_C \frac{d <u>r</u>}{dt}dt[/tex]

Thanks,

So from there can i go ahead and substitute the [tex]\frac{d <u>r</u>}{dt}[/tex] back into the integral? or am i missing a few steps? It seems a little easy. Also, where does the C come into it?
 
Last edited:
Also, howcome the underlines don't show up in my LaTeX?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K